February 13, 2022 08:06PM
Quote
JamesJM
Stafford was outstanding in this game... some things about our O were not, actually a lot of things... but NOT Stafford.. the man was ice, he was exactly what we hoped he'd be.

and it is think kind of overselling that I disagree with,

Stafford was good and came though when it mattered---but he was not outstanding in this game. He was outstanding on last drive.

How many 3 and outs?
Too many.

Missed throws,.

Picks not on him... but he played within himself... he played smarter than he's been playing---THis new and no hero play Stafford is
what was needed---He's a Super Bowl-winning QB...and he did it by reigning himself in for 4 straight games, rode the running game (though
not tonight) but in playoffs and let the defense do the work. He was not playing hero ball, he was not doing silly things.

He has been a very smart QB for the last month. Very smart. Not outstanding, but some great throws....

but let's not start the hyperbole.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  In defense of Stafford

stlrams13644February 13, 2022 07:54PM

  Re: In defense of Stafford

Classicalwit214February 13, 2022 07:57PM

  Re: In defense of Stafford

stlrams13228February 13, 2022 07:59PM

  That second to Show... who said on the GTF...

JamesJM291February 13, 2022 08:00PM

  Disagree

JimYoungblood53195February 13, 2022 08:06PM

  That's ok, I get that, and yet completely disagree....

JamesJM253February 13, 2022 08:14PM

  Re: That's ok, I get that, and yet completely disagree....

napoli168February 13, 2022 08:18PM

  Yes, you said that better than I did..

JamesJM145February 13, 2022 08:22PM

  Who cares about Goff?

JimYoungblood53135February 13, 2022 08:50PM

  Who talked about stats?

JimYoungblood53142February 13, 2022 08:48PM

  I know that JY...

JamesJM145February 13, 2022 08:58PM

  I just want to be able to say a QB can be good and WIN

JimYoungblood53111February 13, 2022 09:07PM

  I get that...

JamesJM157February 13, 2022 09:14PM

  I also say that the 75-yarder TD by Bengals was BS

JimYoungblood53154February 13, 2022 09:13PM

  I already posted about that...

JamesJM116February 13, 2022 09:16PM

  Problem is they don't

JimYoungblood53143February 13, 2022 09:22PM

  That's BS and you know it....

JamesJM142February 13, 2022 09:27PM

  I agree it is BS.

JimYoungblood53144February 13, 2022 09:33PM

  Yeah, it sure looked like a false start to me, as well..

sstrams134February 14, 2022 02:36AM

  It was, BUT, we did not get many breaks Attachments

JimYoungblood53287February 14, 2022 05:50AM

  I don't know

waterfield138February 13, 2022 08:41PM

  Leave the INTS out, because tonight were not his fault

JimYoungblood5398February 13, 2022 08:54PM

  YES, one cannot use the Int's against Stafford. (nm)

JamesJM126February 13, 2022 09:00PM

  Re: Leave the INTS out, because tonight were not his fault

waterfield199February 13, 2022 09:08PM

  Re: Disagree

Payote75131February 13, 2022 09:32PM

  No

JimYoungblood53146February 13, 2022 09:36PM

  If they were really comitting to run

Hazlet Hacksaw132February 14, 2022 05:26AM

  Your not giving the Bengals much credit here

waterfield138February 14, 2022 06:43AM

  They were a very good team

JimYoungblood5393February 14, 2022 07:54AM

  Re: Disagree

Rams43102February 14, 2022 06:25AM

  A running game would have sure helped him

NewMexicoRam188February 14, 2022 06:27AM

  AGree with both, 2nd one 100% not his fault

JimYoungblood53132February 13, 2022 08:00PM

  poor pass but.....

21Dog142February 14, 2022 05:40AM

  I did think a bad throw caused OBJ's injury..

sstrams134February 14, 2022 02:32AM

  Re: In defense of Stafford

MDAlum139February 14, 2022 05:06AM

  I don’t think enough has been made of Stafford having to operate virtually without a running game…

Rams43123February 14, 2022 06:33AM

  Re: I don’t think enough has been made of Stafford having to operate virtually without a running game…

MamaRAMa220February 14, 2022 06:56AM