I'm not saying they shouldn't run, but I don't know that rushing for 100+ is really an indicator of winning against them. They've had 7 games giving up 100+ and won 5 and lost 2. Considering one of those was without Murray and Hopkins, I think it's difficult to say that it was primarily that they gave up rushing yards. Even the "close" games criteria is still 3/4 and it still muddies that conversation when you consider the absence if their two biggest weapons.
The turnover battle seems to be more indicative in the wins and losses. I'd say that the Rams just need to play their game on offense in terms of yards but don't have any turnovers. If they stay clean, rushing yards can be modest and they can still win.