Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: um....yes

July 21, 2021 01:17PM
Quote
zn
Quote
dzrams
every RB McVay has plugged into his scheme has been effective.

That's not accurate. You have to look at 2020 gamelogs.

Because of injuries, missing games, AND 4 games where he didn't produce when healthy, Henderson has NOT been consistently productive.

Not counting the game he missed entirely at the end, that's 7 games.

In those 7 games DH carried 47 times for 92 yards, an avg of 1.96 a carry.

You can do this to any RB. No one said that EVERY game was effective. I didn't say that he was consistently productive. That's you either not reading or changing things. My assertion is that overall every RB, including the let go Brown and scrap heap CJ, have been effective in McVay's system when plugged in. (obviously that means when they're playing so missed games don't count).

But if you want to nitpick game logs, let's look at Akers. 5 games inactive or injured, ineffective week 10 for 5 carries, 15 yards, ineffective week 16 with 21 carries, 34 yards. That's 7 games for him too.

On Henderson, it would help to list the other 2 games you're saying he missed due to injuries since he played in 15 games. It would also help to list the 4 games you're talking about where he didn't produce when healthy. Without details your charge is vague and can't be assessed.

I'd say that being ranked #11 in Success Rate is near conclusive evidence of effectiveness. Success Rate is the best metric for consistency. Nearly every RB has a bad game here or there but if you're #11 in the consistency metric, you're doing better and more consistently effective than most.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/21/2021 01:24PM by dzrams.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  The sky is not falling on the Rams rushing attack just yet

HornsUpRamily!273July 20, 2021 08:38PM

  Re: The sky is not falling on the Rams rushing attack just yet

oldmanram60July 21, 2021 01:47AM

  a couple things on Henderson

LMU9386July 21, 2021 03:53AM

  Re: a couple things on Henderson

zn69July 21, 2021 03:58AM

  Re: a couple things on Henderson

LMU9352July 21, 2021 04:28AM

  Re: a couple things on Henderson

dzrams23July 21, 2021 08:32AM

  Re: a couple things on Henderson

Rams4319July 21, 2021 09:04AM

  Re: a couple things on Henderson

dzrams14July 21, 2021 09:11AM

  not really no

zn24July 21, 2021 12:39PM

  Re: um....yes

dzrams18July 21, 2021 01:17PM

  Re: um....yes

zn18July 22, 2021 12:29AM

  I agree, look for the Rams to pick up a RB - this is a SB window

ferragamo7917July 21, 2021 08:43AM

  agree on Henderson...it's just the injuries issue.

SunTzu_vs_Camus12July 22, 2021 04:12AM

  Unless you have a Superman at RB.....

roman1870July 21, 2021 04:10AM

  agree with that sentiment

LMU9324July 21, 2021 07:11AM

  Re: agree with that sentiment

zn18July 22, 2021 02:11AM

  I have only 2 questions about Hendy, really‚Ķ

Rams4373July 21, 2021 07:03AM

  Re: Totally agree 43....

oldschoolramfan34July 21, 2021 07:35AM