May 04, 2021 07:15AM
Quote
zn
Quote
PHDram
It's because they liked Brewer and Anchrum etc that they CHOOSE to not select oline rather then these guys must step up because they IGNORED the oline. The 1 exception to that is lt. Addressing that spot will be a challenge imo.

The issues are LOT and center, for 2022.

That has nothing to do with Anchrum or Brewer.

I mean I know there's a temptation to say no matter what they did it's good and smart and is the best thing and no criticism is valid, etc.

And Anchrum and Brewer do have promise, that's clear. I've been big on both of them for a long time and I'm not alone.

But their promise is either at guard or ROT. The future issues are at center and LOT.

Agreed, zn.

Rams are playing chess with their OL options. And playing it pretty darned well, I might add.

Clearly, they like their options at OC. I mean, they seem to have 4 options there.

Edwards could start at either OG and probably at RT, if necessary.

I see at least 5 candidates for starting OG already on this roster and Evans is the least attractive to me, tbh.

They have a minimum of 4 candidates to start at RT.

The above shouts great quality depth, doesn’t it?

So, as you say, LOT for ‘22 and beyond is the elephant in the room. Rams know this better than we do and will pursue all options until they find a solution.

It’s far too early for any predictions but that hasn’t stopped me before, so here goes...

Corbett will be extended whether at OG or OC, depending. I predict that he will have earned it.

Big Whit will retire and Rams must choose one of extending Boom (assuming his run blocking has improved sufficiently), an expensive FA, or a premium draft pick. Pick one. It would have been nice if Rams had added a quality LOT in this draft so that they could have a year to develop and assess, but they went in other directions. Sigh...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams see Chandler Brewer as 'our draft pick this year' after passing on O-line

RamBill832May 03, 2021 12:22PM

  I'll be rooting for him - his story is inspiring

promomasterj278May 03, 2021 03:31PM

  agree

21Dog250May 03, 2021 04:09PM

  +1......nm

Arkansas Ram199May 03, 2021 06:01PM

  Re: Rams see Chandler Brewer as 'our draft pick this year' after passing on O-line

Classicalwit232May 03, 2021 03:57PM

  Re: Rams see Chandler Brewer as 'our draft pick this year' after passing on O-line

Ekern55183May 03, 2021 07:10PM

  Re: Rams see Chandler Brewer as 'our draft pick this year' after passing on O-line

stlramz206May 03, 2021 07:54PM

  He can play too

Speedball89267May 03, 2021 06:34PM

  Re: He can play too

3030258May 04, 2021 03:41AM

  Re: He can play too

den-the-coach276May 04, 2021 03:46AM

  Re: He can play too

3030189May 04, 2021 04:22AM

  Re: He can play too

den-the-coach297May 04, 2021 04:49AM

  Re: He can play too

3030173May 04, 2021 05:20AM

  this is part of the Rams' shrinking margin for error

LMU93214May 04, 2021 04:06AM

  I think you're looking at it incorrectly

PHDram198May 04, 2021 04:24AM

  Re: This is accurate...

dzrams167May 04, 2021 06:50AM

  neither one plays LOT or center

zn315May 04, 2021 06:55AM

  i agree regarding the LT

PHDram477May 04, 2021 07:03AM

  Re: i agree regarding the LT

zn165May 04, 2021 07:08AM

  note sure where you read that

PHDram137May 04, 2021 11:02AM

  Re: i agree regarding the LT

dzrams173May 04, 2021 07:17AM

  Re: neither one plays LOT or center

Rams43152May 04, 2021 07:15AM

  Re: neither one plays LOT or center

dzrams210May 04, 2021 07:24AM

  Re: neither one plays LOT or center

Rams43235May 04, 2021 09:57AM

  Re: neither one plays LOT or center

dzrams138May 04, 2021 10:00AM

  Re: neither one plays LOT or center

zn155May 04, 2021 09:18AM

  Were there any high LT prospects at 57?

promomasterj117May 04, 2021 08:54AM

  Re: Were there any high LT prospects at 57?

dzrams127May 04, 2021 09:06AM

  All 3 guys are developmental prospects...

promomasterj175May 04, 2021 09:17AM

  Re: All 3 guys are developmental prospects...

dzrams128May 04, 2021 09:24AM

  All our developmental guys are guards or RT's

promomasterj120May 04, 2021 10:23AM

  Re: Were there any high LT prospects at 57?

zn158May 04, 2021 09:20AM

  snead said

PHDram132May 04, 2021 11:31AM

  Re: I think you're looking at it incorrectly

LMU93137May 04, 2021 10:13AM

  Re: I think you're looking at it incorrectly

BerendsenRam125May 04, 2021 11:04AM