April 23, 2021 01:32PM
It was a very risky move when they had the guy they needed sitting right there before them.
That's why I say that without knowing exactly who the Rams targets are, I suspect if a guy the Rams really like is sitting there are 57, they aren't going to get cute about it and risk losing him to pick up an extra 5th or 6th rounder.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams 7-round mock: cB first, OC second after trading back...

Rams43778April 23, 2021 07:52AM

  Not the way I'd go, but not bad either

RockRam355April 23, 2021 07:58AM

  It's more about who's on the board tbh

merlin274April 23, 2021 08:11AM

  Also re: Stanford players...

merlin322April 23, 2021 08:19AM

  Re: Also re: Stanford players...

oldschoolramfan364April 23, 2021 08:37AM

  The trade back predicted in the 2nd now is unlikely as KC has the 58th pick

The Professor325April 23, 2021 12:45PM

  Wow. Loved that draft.

alyoshamucci280April 23, 2021 12:49PM

  Re: Wow. Loved that draft.

montanaram191April 23, 2021 01:03PM

  It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead

RockRam199April 23, 2021 01:32PM

  Re: It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead

Rams43206April 23, 2021 01:41PM

  yeah bro...me too..

SunTzu_vs_Camus254April 25, 2021 04:47AM

  Re: Instant recon

leafnose135April 25, 2021 09:47AM

  I would be very happy with that....

LMU93183April 25, 2021 09:50AM