Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead

April 23, 2021 01:41PM
Quote
RockRam
It was a very risky move when they had the guy they needed sitting right there before them.
That's why I say that without knowing exactly who the Rams targets are, I suspect if a guy the Rams really like is sitting there are 57, they aren't going to get cute about it and risk losing him to pick up an extra 5th or 6th rounder.

I agree if a guy they REALLY like is sitting there at 57. A Bobby Wagner type of desire?

However...

If there are 6-8 guys that Rams like more or less equally sitting there at 57, I could easily see them trading down 6 spots. And the compensation would be more than a 5th or 6th, btw.

[profootballtalk.nbcsports.com]

A move down to 64 would fetch a late 4th, it appears. And that’s just a 6 slot move for players that the Rams rate equally to the guys at 57. Sooooo...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams 7-round mock: cB first, OC second after trading back...

Rams43772April 23, 2021 07:52AM

  Not the way I'd go, but not bad either

RockRam350April 23, 2021 07:58AM

  It's more about who's on the board tbh

merlin270April 23, 2021 08:11AM

  Also re: Stanford players...

merlin317April 23, 2021 08:19AM

  Re: Also re: Stanford players...

oldschoolramfan360April 23, 2021 08:37AM

  The trade back predicted in the 2nd now is unlikely as KC has the 58th pick

The Professor320April 23, 2021 12:45PM

  Wow. Loved that draft.

alyoshamucci276April 23, 2021 12:49PM

  Re: Wow. Loved that draft.

montanaram188April 23, 2021 01:03PM

  It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead

RockRam195April 23, 2021 01:32PM

  Re: It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead

Rams43202April 23, 2021 01:41PM

  yeah bro...me too..

SunTzu_vs_Camus250April 25, 2021 04:47AM

  Re: Instant recon

leafnose132April 25, 2021 09:47AM

  I would be very happy with that....

LMU93180April 25, 2021 09:50AM