It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

April 23, 2021 01:32PM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 10,493
Status: HOF Inductee

It was a very risky move when they had the guy they needed sitting right there before them.
That's why I say that without knowing exactly who the Rams targets are, I suspect if a guy the Rams really like is sitting there are 57, they aren't going to get cute about it and risk losing him to pick up an extra 5th or 6th rounder.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Rams 7-round mock: cB first, OC second after trading back...	Rams43	773	April 23, 2021 07:52AM
Not the way I'd go, but not bad either	RockRam	351	April 23, 2021 07:58AM
It's more about who's on the board tbh	merlin	271	April 23, 2021 08:11AM
Also re: Stanford players...	merlin	318	April 23, 2021 08:19AM
Re: Also re: Stanford players...	oldschoolramfan	361	April 23, 2021 08:37AM
The trade back predicted in the 2nd now is unlikely as KC has the 58th pick	The Professor	321	April 23, 2021 12:45PM
Wow. Loved that draft.	alyoshamucci	277	April 23, 2021 12:49PM
Re: Wow. Loved that draft.	montanaram	188	April 23, 2021 01:03PM
It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead	RockRam	195	April 23, 2021 01:32PM
Re: It was Fisher that cost us Bobby Wagner; not Pead	Rams43	203	April 23, 2021 01:41PM
yeah bro...me too..	SunTzu_vs_Camus	251	April 25, 2021 04:47AM
Re: Instant recon	leafnose	132	April 25, 2021 09:47AM
I would be very happy with that....	LMU93	180	April 25, 2021 09:50AM

Previous Message Next Message

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

RamsFootballFans.com Bucky's Pub The RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate Party Game Time Forum Help and Support Forum Jack Youngblood Chat Jim Everett Chat Kevin Demoff Chat Deacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&A Announcements Recent Messages