Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Two reasons...

February 18, 2021 07:29AM
Quote
ramBRO
Quote
Rampage2K-
And conditional 2 in 2022


Didn't Wentz sign his extension around the same time as Goff's?

Assuming that a similar amount of years are remaining on his (Wentz's) deal, why isn't Philly being asked to pay a premium to unload him like we had to (i.e. a future guaranteed 1st)?

First, the contracts were structured differently which means that the trading teams - Philly and LA - are absorbing differing amounts. Philly gave a larger signing bonus to Wentz which means that they took a bigger dead money hit. The receiving team is left with the rest of the contract. Since Philly took a bigger dead money hit, Indy is getting a more palatable contract with Wentz. They owe Wentz $25M in 2021 whereas Detroit owes Goff about $28M. The other 4 years on the respective contracts are similar in that Indy gets Wentz for about $3-$4M cheaper each year.

That better value is worth additional compensation.

Secondly, it's already been reported that the league viewed Wentz as the better, more talented QB. Goff is seen as being a McVay creation. Pretty simple. I think we're seeing that reflected in trade value.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Wentz to Colts for 3rd

Rampage2K-864February 18, 2021 06:57AM

  This is a delayed bomb

Stafford9322February 18, 2021 07:02AM

  First Winston & Mariota & Now Goff And Wentz

den-the-coach275February 18, 2021 07:08AM

  Re: First Winston & Mariota & Now Goff And Wentz

Classicalwit141February 18, 2021 02:11PM

  I am a huge Wentz fan

Stafford9147February 18, 2021 02:20PM

  Re: Wentz to Colts for 3rd

Rams43225February 18, 2021 07:11AM

  Re: Wentz to Colts for 3rd

Rams43209February 18, 2021 07:12AM

  Wait A Second...

ramBRO285February 18, 2021 07:14AM

  Re: Two reasons...

dzrams252February 18, 2021 07:29AM

  Re: Two reasons...

ramBRO212February 18, 2021 08:16AM

  Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

RockRam211February 18, 2021 12:14PM

  Re: Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

dzrams290February 18, 2021 12:35PM

  Re: Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

no name141February 18, 2021 12:49PM

  Re: Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

dzrams142February 18, 2021 12:58PM

  Re: Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

BearlyThere145February 18, 2021 01:38PM

  Re: Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

dzrams395February 18, 2021 01:54PM

  Re: Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

BearlyThere173February 18, 2021 01:56PM

  Re: Yeah, well, this is the folks who can't evaluate QBs with much accuracy

dzrams147February 18, 2021 02:14PM

  Re: Wait A Second...

Rampage2K-204February 18, 2021 08:15AM

  Oh....

DaJudge195February 18, 2021 09:08AM

  Re: Wait A Second...

Ekern55220February 18, 2021 08:28AM

  Well, does that mean Wentz had more value than Goff (nm)

RockRam178February 18, 2021 07:18AM

  Absolutely

Stafford9207February 18, 2021 07:40AM

  Apples and Oranges

waterfield300February 18, 2021 08:32AM

  agree, personally I think the Rams had to pay more to get Goff's contract off the books

Stafford9190February 18, 2021 06:07PM

  depends on what you consider "value"

Rampage2K-195February 18, 2021 08:29AM

  Re: Wentz to Colts for 1st rounder

max231February 18, 2021 08:23AM

  Re: Wentz to Colts for 1st rounder

dzrams249February 18, 2021 08:55AM

  Re: Wentz to Colts for 1st rounder

max195February 18, 2021 09:19AM

  IMO a good landing spot for him....

roman18143February 18, 2021 09:34AM

  Re: Wentz to Colts for 3rd

no name136February 18, 2021 12:26PM

  Re: Wentz to Colts for 3rd

Rams43132February 18, 2021 03:47PM