Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Rams need a D that is NOT carried by ONE man.

January 17, 2021 04:15AM
Quote
Ramgator
I look back at the 1985 Bears. If Singletary or Dent go down to 50% ability, I do not see the Rams and Dickerson suddenly putting up 30+ on them in the Title game. It would not have suddenly made Duerson or Fencik crappy tacklers. Last night's effort was VERY disappointing. And was very close to being much worse. AD even being OUT the entire game was ZERO excuse for some of the crap that happened. Rodgers or no Rodgers.

I agree. This has been my primary concern about the Rams defense for a while now; it's too dependent on the effect of one player. AD is 30 now, so it might be time to seriously reinvest at the DL position as opposed to only looking at it from a 'one-year-rental' perspective.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams need a D that is NOT carried by ONE man.

Ramgator214January 17, 2021 03:55AM

  Re: Rams need a D that is NOT carried by ONE man.

oldmanram188January 17, 2021 04:04AM

  Re: Rams need a D that is NOT carried by ONE man.

Classicalwit106January 17, 2021 04:15AM

  They aren't......

roman18125January 17, 2021 04:21AM

  Re: Rams need a D that is NOT carried by ONE man.

RamsDynasty204January 17, 2021 04:56AM

  Re: Rams need a D that is NOT carried by ONE man.

73Ram184January 17, 2021 05:06AM

  Yup....

JamesJM82January 17, 2021 05:21AM

  That's why, for me anyways........

NewMexicoRam103January 17, 2021 05:07AM

  Well, that is true---needed better edge play

JimYoungblood5393January 17, 2021 05:18AM