December 20, 2020 02:34PM
Quote
kw13
I believe we are not clinched.

In a 3 or 4 way tie at 9-7 between us, AZ, the Bears, and/or Tampa our head to head with the Bears (or Tampa) gets thrown out and it's conference record and we would have lost 2 more NFC games.

Isn’t the first tie breaker head to head?

There is only four teams for three spots I think the head to head win vs Bears and TB gives Rams the edge

Bears only chance is Cardinals go 8-8 and Bears go 9-7 it would seem?



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot?

Rampage2K-444December 20, 2020 12:39PM

  Re: With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot? Yes

Rampage2K-394December 20, 2020 01:25PM

  You sure about that? I don't think so. (nm)

JamesJM268December 20, 2020 02:16PM

  Re: With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot? Yes

kw13198December 20, 2020 02:17PM

  Re: With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot? Yes

Rampage2K-468December 20, 2020 02:34PM

  Re: With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot? Yes

Classicalwit212December 20, 2020 02:39PM

  Re: With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot? Yes

AlbaNY_Ram97December 20, 2020 03:42PM

  Re: With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot? Yes

kw13178December 20, 2020 05:55PM

  Re: With Viking loss didn’t Rams clinch playoff spot? Yes

Great Bordeni139December 20, 2020 04:07PM

  I think a Bears and Vikings tie would've advanced the Rams (nm)

raminsanantone142December 20, 2020 02:37PM