Quote
alyoshamucci
It's all over the place.
The consistent kids lack athleticism and the other guys are hot and cold ... there are going to be crazy risers in the post season and people sliding that maybe shouldn't (roche'?) ... and what about the kids that opt out?
If they're consistent and check all the boxes they'll likely be gone by 64. We have try hard players so I'd be looking for an athlete with question marks elsewhere.
Ossai at Texas keeps jumping at me ... I figure Brenton Cox is gone? ... Zaven Collins I feel will rise in the postseason but he's a big target ... THere's 2 kinds on Pitt ... and Roche was a preseason top 10 that is being mentioned in the 3rd now ...
I like my edges 6-4 255 and twitchy.
Brenton Cox would fit for me really well but I think he's gone before 50 ...
Ossai might be the smart target because I feel like he'll be a much better pro than college player. I think they haven't developed him well enough.
Well, thanks for the realistic reply, Alyo.
Snead’s gotta know what his prospects are at around pick 64. He’s gotta go with BPA there unless several, including edge, are just a hairbreadth apart.
So, by a process of elimination, Snead might be forced to somehow find room for Floyd’s new salary OR turn to FA once again for a critically needed impactful edge player. I don’t think it can be overstated how badly this Staley D needs at least one quality edge player to be it’s most effective. Sigh...
