Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: That is purely speculation

July 10, 2020 05:00PM
Quote
Classicalwit
I don't remember hearing that 2.2MM people were going to die, I've always heard 200-250K. It would have taken rampant failure and unchecked civic stupidity for 2.2MM of us to die. Maybe that was someone's worst case, catastrophic scenario.

It was one of many different predictions made last March. That particular forecast comes from England. Many virus "doubters" keep it alive as an example of an extreme prediction, hoping that way to discredit all of the science we have gotten on this.

In response AT THE TIME the CDC openly doubted that figure.

Quote

from [medicalxpress.com]

A bombshell study from a team of infectious disease experts at Imperial College London this week predicted that without intervention the disease could lead to 510,000 deaths in Britain and 2.2 million in the United States.

Respected public health expert Anthony Fauci told CNN on Sunday that it was "possible" hundreds of thousands of Americans could die.

That particular prediction was about what would happen if nothing were done about the virus. If nothing were done, the forecasters claimed, the USA could face an 80% infection rate. 80% of 328 M would be 262 M infected, and 2.2 M deaths would be 0.84% of that.

The doubters who try to keep the 2.2 M figure alive always leave out the If nothing were done part.


....

...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/10/2020 05:05PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  If you were a player, would you play?

spagsbacker772July 10, 2020 09:36AM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

Rams43256July 10, 2020 11:35AM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

spagsbacker203July 10, 2020 11:44AM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

Rams43303July 10, 2020 12:05PM

  some of the damage might be permanent

promomasterj192July 10, 2020 12:24PM

  That is purely speculation

RockRam329July 10, 2020 02:34PM

  no it is not speculation

zn205July 10, 2020 02:57PM

  What's the real risk of long term consequences?

NewMexicoRam385July 11, 2020 09:01AM

  Re: What's the real risk of long term consequences?

zn170July 11, 2020 09:09AM

  So we make huge economic decisions based on the unknown?

NewMexicoRam210July 11, 2020 09:54AM

  no.......................

zn164July 11, 2020 09:57AM

  Then close the debate.

NewMexicoRam176July 11, 2020 09:58AM

  Re: Then close the debate.

zn173July 11, 2020 10:00AM

  " left leaning media bosses"

waterfield167July 11, 2020 09:36AM

  Re: That is purely speculation

Classicalwit175July 10, 2020 04:40PM

  Re: That is purely speculation

zn185July 10, 2020 05:00PM

  Re: That is purely speculation

Classicalwit165July 10, 2020 05:18PM

  Exactly. And "doubters" is very kind of you, ZN (nm)

Suh-weet!187July 10, 2020 05:46PM

  February called - they want their opinions back

promomasterj178July 10, 2020 12:25PM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

reggae239July 10, 2020 06:35PM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

Coy Bacon330July 10, 2020 12:18PM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

six2stack175July 10, 2020 02:09PM

  How coronavirus affects athletes (article)

RamsFanSince69174July 10, 2020 02:14PM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

Classicalwit166July 10, 2020 04:41PM

  YES!!! They will have so many test and protections for them

Rampage2K-167July 10, 2020 05:03PM

  Re: YES!!! They will have so many test and protections for them

waterfield166July 10, 2020 07:40PM

  Re: YES!!! They will have so many test and protections for them

Rampage2K-166July 10, 2020 08:58PM

  Re: YES!!! They will have so many test and protections for them

waterfield161July 10, 2020 10:00PM

  Re: YES!!! They will have so many test and protections for them

Rampage2K-170July 10, 2020 10:16PM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

spagsbacker164July 11, 2020 06:27AM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

Rampage2K-167July 11, 2020 07:50AM

  Re: question was rhetorical....

spagsbacker158July 11, 2020 08:03AM

  Re: question was rhetorical....

Rampage2K-188July 11, 2020 08:38AM

  Re: question was rhetorical....

zn157July 11, 2020 08:43AM

  Re: question was rhetorical....

Rampage2K-168July 11, 2020 08:52AM

  Re: question was rhetorical....

zn163July 11, 2020 09:11AM

  Re: question was rhetorical....

Rampage2K-162July 11, 2020 09:46AM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

waterfield283July 11, 2020 09:29AM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

Rampage2K-165July 11, 2020 10:05AM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

zn158July 11, 2020 10:11AM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

Rampage2K-171July 11, 2020 10:22AM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

waterfield153July 11, 2020 11:33AM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

Rampage2K-152July 11, 2020 01:22PM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

Classicalwit309July 11, 2020 01:37PM

  Re: why enough testing for pro athletes but not the public?

waterfield192July 11, 2020 03:00PM

  players are opting out NBA and MLB

ferragamo79174July 10, 2020 06:33PM

  Re: players are opting out NBA and MLB

waterfield176July 10, 2020 07:41PM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

Steve162July 10, 2020 09:48PM

  Re: If you were a player, would you play?

waterfield227July 11, 2020 09:54AM

  body builder before and after

shellback246July 11, 2020 12:43AM