Re: and yet he points to a design that was abandoned decades ago
|
|
You didn't say "if".Quote
zn
Quote
moklerman
The brand is the horns. Re-branding is not necessary. It's really pretty simple and painting Dryer as an out of touch, behind the times, crusty old man because he stated as such is a bad take. Just own it and move on.Quote
zn
Quote
moklerman
Quote
zn
Quote
Rams43
Yup. Fred always had a way with words, didn’t he?
Every player is naturally going to prefer the symbols and imagery that represent the team they played for.
And they will be all gruff and stubborn about it.
Meanwhile the design and colors have changed several times since that one.
It's like an old man saying "nothing will ever replace the horse!" while cars whiz by him.
Now the horns? That's the Rams. That ain't goin nowhere.
The design though has already changed many times.
...
So, all of that was to ultimately agree with Dryer? "That's your "brand" right there". Not design. Not colors. Your crusty, out of touch, old man is WAY off base.
So that's what he said? It's just the horns, it doesn't matter about the colors and design, which have changed? If so who was he arguing with? All the people associated with the Rams who have vowed there will be no horns?
He either meant that particular design (horns that thick, those colors), in which case it has already changed several times. Or he meant just the horns, in which case he isn't arguing with anyone. No one has said "okay no more horns."
And I am a crusty old man myself so I don't mind calling him one.
...
***
If he meant just "the horns" then he's not arguing with anyone. (Kind of like you.) Is he? No one is "re-branding" the horns out of existence. So who is he arguing with.
IF he means the design, then yeah all players prefer the design when they played. That's just natural. But...the design has changed several times since he played. Even the current throwback helmet doesn't look like that.
So again. If he meant that specific design then the real point is, it has already been changed several times. If he meant just the horns, regardless of design, then he is not arguing with anyone---since no one has vowed to eliminate the horns.
Either way you seem to want to defend old man Dreyer for saying nothing. Fine with me. But I've read and seen a lot of interviews with Dreyer, he's a smart guy and it shows. This time though he's either got no point or he's arguing with no one.
Fight away about that if you have to. As for me, I'm just repeating myself. Shrug.
...
Quote
ZN
Every player is naturally going to prefer the symbols and imagery that represent the team they played for.
And they will be all gruff and stubborn about it.
And yet another strawman by you is suggesting that someone is reacting to the Rams rebranding the horns out of existence. No one anywhere accused the Rams of getting rid of the horns but DeMoff and the team are definitely rebranding. All of the waves and spirals bologna is what Dryer's responding to. He says it's about the horns and I agree. Messing with them, which DeMoff has done and is sticking to, is what Dryer and many(most) Rams fans and ex-players don't seem to care for.
