Re: Rams need Cooks/Alt burner for deep ball

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

April 08, 2020 09:40AM

Registered: 4 years ago
Posts: 1,283
Status: All Pro

I say a burner is not needed we need a big possesion receiver that can be a redzone target. And catch the contested ball with some speed. Chase claypool might fit that need at 6'4 and close to 240 with 4.42 speed

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
The Deep Ball --A little perspective	rampage666	638	April 07, 2020 10:53PM
Re: The Deep Ball --A little perspective	zn	263	April 08, 2020 02:54AM
Rams need Cooks/Alt burner for deep ball	Steve	396	April 08, 2020 04:55AM
Re: Rams need Cooks/Alt burner for deep ball	cool_hand_luke	296	April 08, 2020 07:12AM
Re: Rams need Cooks/Alt burner for deep ball	nicecatchellard	273	April 08, 2020 09:40AM
TE Everett is that RZ target. imo	SunTzu_vs_Camus	263	April 09, 2020 08:55AM
Re: TE Everett is that RZ target. imo	nicecatchellard	204	April 09, 2020 12:36PM
Re: Rams need Cooks/Alt burner for deep ball	Steve	234	April 08, 2020 09:54PM
John Hightower - Boise St.	3030	228	April 09, 2020 06:07AM
Re: John Hightower - Boise St.	Steve	115	April 10, 2020 05:21AM
the deep ball thing and Cooks	LMU93	118	April 10, 2020 05:40AM
Re: Can Goff throw a good deep pass? Seriously.	spagsbacker	180	April 10, 2020 05:48AM
yes and it shows in the numbers for 2018, when the OL was more coherent	zn	322	April 10, 2020 05:57AM

Previous Message Next Message

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

RamsFootballFans.com Bucky's Pub The RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate Party Game Time Forum Help and Support Forum Jack Youngblood Chat Jim Everett Chat Kevin Demoff Chat Deacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&A Announcements Recent Messages