Again, no science. Fauci himself is stressing this.
Quote
. [
www.insideover.com]
The other day, he warned soberly of false hopes after Trump raved about the anti-malaria drug chloroquine, which he claimed could undoubtedly be used in the fight against corona. “The answer is no,” Fauci said when asked if chloroquine was a cure for the virus. Trump had based his hope on groundless anecdotes, not clinical data.
Science is not one person anecdotally claiming something (Fauci himself calls the kinds of stories you cite "anectodal." )
Science means you have groups of people under controlled conditions running tests and then they publish those findings in peer reviewed studies which get examined by others who see if there are any flaws in the data plus see whether or not the results can be reproduced.
This is why Fauci and others warn against
What's wishful thinking is us believing things are promising when they have not undergone that rigorous process.
Until the science examines this no one knows whether that French doctor you cite (which I already know about) gave the drug to a group of patients who had a mild enough infection so they would have improved anyway.
....
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/02/2020 03:44PM by zn.
