January 16, 2020 09:07AM
Lots of ideas and possibilities have been suggested and that just illustrates how fluid things are on our ‘20 OL. And the ‘20 OL is our biggest issue and Job One this offseason, right?

Well, here’s my 2 cents which is being offered before trades, FA, and the draft.

Kromer stays, but with OL responsibilities only.

LOT must be solid for our O to have any chance of big success, but I don’t see cap room for an aging and declining Whit. Don’t see a LOT drafted at #52, either. That pick will go elsewhere. Perhaps a stud C falls, otherwise it will likely be BPA among DT, DE, or Edge. I agree with others that see some combo of Edwards or Evans at LOT until Boom is healthy. I believe that Boom will be healthy sooner rather than later. Edwards or Evans will have to hold down his place until then.

LG will probably be Corbett, unless he really impresses at C.

I see a stud C drafted with our #52 if one falls. It will solidify that important position for years. I hope they don’t ‘settle’ for Blythe and Allen has yet to win me over. If the draft doesn’t provide that stud C then I see Snead working on a trade or outside FA scenario. Bottom line is that C must be fixed and I don’t think that our ‘20 starter is already on the roster unless it’s Corbett. And even that would create a hole at LG.

Edwards looks like our long term RG (could be a LG, though). But if he’s pressed into duty at LOT then Kromer’s gotta scramble here. Might be somebody already on the roster, another outside FA, or another trade or draft pick. I dunno.

I could see a healthy Hav claiming that starting RT spot. That might be the best scenario for the Rams freeing up Evans for competition at early LOT, either available OG position, or just as a terrific swing player off the bench. Then again, Evans might just beat out Hav at RT straight up.

Bottom line is that Kromer has options even with a departing Whit and a rehabbing Boom. If they can bolster that C position, then I can see a possible above average OL for ‘20. A young and inexpensive one that could become even better than merely ‘above average’, frankly. But I don’t think either Blythe or Allen are good enough. Not good enough to get us back to SB worthy status, anyway.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/16/2020 09:09AM by Rams43.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Some thoughts about our possible ‘20 OL personnel...

Rams43697January 16, 2020 09:07AM

  Re: Some thoughts about our possible ‘20 OL personnel...

zn236January 16, 2020 09:17AM

  Re: Some thoughts about our possible ‘20 OL personnel...

Rams43206January 16, 2020 10:11AM

  Re: Some thoughts about our possible ‘20 OL personnel...

zn184January 16, 2020 10:38AM

  Re: Some thoughts about our possible ‘20 OL personnel...

oldschoolramfan156January 16, 2020 10:59AM

  Re: Some thoughts about our possible ‘20 OL personnel...

zn165January 16, 2020 11:18AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

spagsbacker338January 16, 2020 11:07AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

dzrams221January 16, 2020 11:19AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

spagsbacker181January 16, 2020 11:26AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

zn168January 16, 2020 11:34AM

  Re: they always prioritize line...

spagsbacker148January 16, 2020 02:40PM

  Rams did not neglect the OL

zn207January 16, 2020 05:47PM

  Re: we define neglect differently...

spagsbacker125January 17, 2020 03:08AM

  no you define it "differently"

zn116January 17, 2020 03:21AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

dzrams147January 16, 2020 11:48AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

LMU93163January 16, 2020 12:46PM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

dzrams183January 16, 2020 01:13PM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

LMU93134January 17, 2020 03:58AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

zn118January 17, 2020 04:40AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

zn122January 16, 2020 01:27PM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

LMU93153January 16, 2020 11:26AM

  Re: My issue wasn't the player, it was the position....

spagsbacker173January 16, 2020 11:29AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

Classicalwit157January 16, 2020 06:46PM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

zn160January 16, 2020 11:28AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

spagsbacker163January 16, 2020 11:32AM

  it used to

zn144January 16, 2020 11:37AM

  Re: Not really...

dzrams142January 16, 2020 11:38AM

  Re: I think that is a "rosy" view...

AlbaNY_Ram145January 16, 2020 11:49AM

  Well...

Ram Fan Teacher159January 16, 2020 01:47PM

  Re: Some thoughts about our possible ‘20 OL personnel...

3030162January 16, 2020 12:50PM