December 12, 2019 06:21AM
Quote
L.A.Rams
The Rams traded a first-round pick for Cooks. In just about any draft, it is possible to obtain a better receiver than Cooks in later rounds. Cooks is currently the Rams 4th best WR (behind Kupp, Woods, and Reynolds) and probably the 7th best receiver (behind Kupp, Woods, Reynolds, Higbeast, Everett, and Gurley). The time has come for the Rams to give Reynolds more playing time than Cooks.

Cooks is a role player, and was never meant to be a #1 WR. He is a fast deep threat. So you can't replace him with just any good receiver---his replacement has to be a fast deep threat.

It also has nothing to do with where he's ranked v. other WRs. He's there because he fulfills a role. If someone else does not fulfill that role, they are not a real sub for him. So Cooks may be the Rams 4th best receiver, but he is their 1st best and possibly ONLY guy in the deep threat role, and if you get rid of that role, you change the entire offense.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Goffs best throw of the night...

max752December 10, 2019 02:50PM

  Absolute dime

Ram49312December 10, 2019 05:41PM

  Re: Goffs best throw of the night...

Classicalwit300December 10, 2019 06:26PM

  Re: Goffs best throw of the night...

max280December 10, 2019 09:05PM

  He ain't going anywhere just yet

RamUK269December 11, 2019 02:59AM

  probably right

max282December 11, 2019 03:12AM

  Did the defender get a piece of the ball?

L.A.Rams299December 11, 2019 07:43AM

  Re: Did the defender get a piece of the ball?

max284December 11, 2019 07:58AM

  Yes, I see now

L.A.Rams266December 11, 2019 08:22AM

  Re: Yes, I see now

max247December 11, 2019 08:52AM

  bottom line on Cooks

L.A.Rams291December 12, 2019 04:22AM

  Re: bottom line on Cooks

max284December 12, 2019 04:32AM

  Re: bottom line on Cooks

Rams43187December 12, 2019 06:45AM

  he's looking like the WR equivalent of Chris Miller nm

21Dog213December 12, 2019 07:25AM

  problem is

zn280December 12, 2019 06:21AM

  But...

ramsfaninmd231December 12, 2019 06:32AM

  Re: But...

zn166December 12, 2019 12:17PM

  Re: problem is

LMU93179December 12, 2019 12:33PM

  Re: problem is

zn164December 12, 2019 01:29PM