Re: "Objectivity" ... sigh.

Quote
Suh-weet!

Quote
moklerman

Quote
73Ram

Quote
moklerman
Shrugging off a careless turnover leads me to question your objectivity. Goff should not be unfairly criticized, nor should he be absolved of his own mistakes. It was the line, it was the weather, it was the playcalling, now it's his receivers. This wasn't a tipped pass, bad luck type of thing. He had a defender in his face and he forced a throw where he wasn't 100% sure about what his receiver was doing. Sometimes it's better to just eat it.

Are we really suggesting that Robert Woods doesn't know what he's doing?

yours is just as in question mokler….you see the plays your way I see them differently

I don't see why my judgment on these plays is as questionable. You seem to be blaming anyone but Goff on plays that are pretty obviously poor decisions by the QB.

On the pick-6, he had a defender crashing down on him and tried to force a pass to a receiver in traffic. And, he apparently wasn't on the same page as the receiver.

On the pick in the end zone, he threw into double coverage.

He chose to take risks or even made bad decisions and they both wound up as turnovers. I think it far more objective to view those plays under that lens than to assume everyone else except Goff is to blame.

As has been said many times, much of the Rams' offense is predicated on timing, on receivers being where they're supposed to be, and on the QB and receivers reading things the same way and being in the same page in that respect. Goff made what looked like it would have been a very good throw. Woods made the wrong read. That was a throw under pressure, but not an "in-traffic" throw. Every successful QB has to know where to go under pressure. If Woods had made the right play, we'd be rightly admiring of Goff for that throw. Instead, strangely, you find fault There's in Goff for making the right play. There's nothing "objective" about that.