Quote
Ram_Ruler
To me anyways. I don't think Reynolds is anywhere near Woods' ability which sets the offense back. Giving up woods this year would almost mean conceding that we aren't looking to legit contend. A first for woods is quite a steal though
When you juggle, you're robbing Peter to pay Paul. And managing the salary cap is a juggling act.
I agree on Reynolds; he's not Woods. But I'm not certain the offense would be set back and definitely don't believe it means they aren't looking to contend this year because they could compensate elsewhere.
For example, Everett is already emerging. They could lean on him a little bit more.
I think we have to consider this: how is it that the Pats can trade great players and never miss a beat? It's not all Tom Brady. It's probably more Bellichek.
Is McVay a genius or what? He can't keep that offense highly productive unless he has 3 dominant WRs?
McVay says Reynolds is near starter quality. Is that true or not?
