Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: im not sure i understand

July 26, 2019 10:55AM
Quote
PHDram
not sure i agree but i guess its possible. to me gurley clearly had some sort of injury, pain,inflammation, whatever you want to call it. it was not severe enough to sit him down but obviously enough to reduce his workload to the point he was almost an afterthought.


Fair enough.

Here are Gurley's rushing attempts in the Super Bowl - minus the one on the phantom holding penalty:

video: [www.nfl.com]

Gurley SB Runs

I'm not looking to get into an argument with you (because I understand we all see things differently), but when you say that Gurley "...clearly had some sort of injury...", I'm just wondering if you clearly saw it on any of these plays.

Again, I'm not disputing that he was suffering from knee irritation. But he wasn't going to the turf with a simple grab of his towel either.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Sean McVay’s Waterloo may not be over yet

NewMexicoRam891July 25, 2019 02:27PM

  Re: Sean McVay’s Waterloo may not be over yet

Rams43329July 25, 2019 02:40PM

  Re: Sean McVay’s Waterloo may not be over yet

RamBill283July 25, 2019 03:08PM

  Re: Sean McVay’s Waterloo may not be over yet

Coy Bacon278July 25, 2019 04:00PM

  Still Not Sure That McVay Was Outcoached

ramBRO292July 25, 2019 06:06PM

  Interesting take (NM)

JamesJM193July 26, 2019 04:04AM

  except

zn268July 26, 2019 04:41AM

  Re: except

ramBRO194July 26, 2019 07:40AM

  Re: except

zn192July 26, 2019 11:11AM

  I agree

Ramboni207July 26, 2019 01:32PM

  im not sure i understand

PHDram258July 26, 2019 05:06AM

  Re: im not sure i understand

ramBRO185July 26, 2019 08:01AM

  Re: im not sure i understand

PHDram169July 26, 2019 10:36AM

  Re: im not sure i understand

ramBRO155July 26, 2019 10:55AM

  Re: im not sure i understand

PHDram149July 26, 2019 12:25PM

  Re: Sean McVay’s Waterloo: LG, C, RG

Steve215July 26, 2019 02:03AM

  Re: Sean McVay’s Waterloo may not be over yet

Classicalwit174July 26, 2019 04:20AM