April 19, 2019 06:28AM
Quote
LMU93
Just my opinion. He has never been a big pass rusher (20 career sacks), though he can push the pocket. Of course a lot depends on how next week shakes out. But I just think Brockers is a better fit mainly at NT and maybe sliding over to DE situationally.

I think that the plan is for Brockers to play the “other” DL position this season. Meaning that Snead will be picking the best possible DL player for the future and Brockers will get “leftovers”.

Brockers’ Ram future beyond this final contract year is kinda hazy. So, who could blame Snead for looking ahead?

I like Brockers, as most of us do. And he’s still a fairly young player who should still be in his prime. But that $11M salary is a tough sell for ‘20 and beyond. Gotta go with younger and far more inexpensive players to make room down the road for Goff and others, don’t you think?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Donald and Brockers on approaching a season without Suh

RamBill425April 17, 2019 06:23PM

  Approaching a season without Suh

leafnose152April 19, 2019 04:36AM

  I think Brockers is best suited at NT

LMU93138April 19, 2019 05:33AM

  Re: I think Brockers is best suited at NT

Rams43148April 19, 2019 06:28AM

  Re: I think Brockers is best suited at NT

LMU93174April 19, 2019 07:12AM

  Re: I think Brockers is best suited at NT

David Deacon87April 20, 2019 03:13AM

  people are basing all this on 2018

zn67April 20, 2019 05:03AM

  Re: people are basing all this on 2018

LMU93100April 20, 2019 06:24AM

  Re: people are basing all this on 2018

zn59April 20, 2019 06:52AM