February 02, 2019 07:56PM
Completely agree on the comments about Rams having to put Gurley on the injury report if he is indeed injured. The entire eyes of the NFL are watching Gurley right now....so they wouldn't be able falsify his status if he was indeed injured. Even some players that have illness get listed. But something like tendinitis, which is more af a residual pain....rather than acute injury or illness can probably be unreported.

The Rams would simply not risk Gurley's long term health if they diagnosed any form of injury....particularly if it was related to the ACL surgery. He probably has about 5 years left of top-level production (of which they have already committed to pay him a minimum of $45 Million of ver the next four). They rested him plenty before the Cowboy game....but don't feel the need to keep him out of practices this week?

So to me, I would agree there is "something" going on....but it's most likely some type of tendinitis that just needs to be managed and will only get completely better with complete rest after the Rams win the Super Bowl.

As far as why he only had 5 touches against the Saints....McVay is has been not waiting very long to make adjustments. After Gurley's two pass drops....he figured he has CJ.....so just switch it up. He wasn't going to wait.

My bigger concern is that Gurley just doesn't seem to have the initial burst of speed that he had much earlier in the season. Not sure what's causing it....but maybe McVay sees it too. It could just be the long grind of a season.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Oh boy

waterfield983February 02, 2019 06:55PM

  Re: Oh boy

napoli378February 02, 2019 07:04PM

  Re: Oh boy

Classicalwit300February 02, 2019 07:06PM

  Some obvious thoughts about his "injury"

Deadpool466February 02, 2019 07:07PM

  Re: Some obvious thoughts about his "injury"

napoli283February 02, 2019 07:12PM

  Re: Some obvious thoughts about his "injury"

Classicalwit321February 02, 2019 07:33PM

  Re: Some obvious thoughts about his "injury"

73Ram209February 03, 2019 03:23AM

  I'm surprised that you think that way.

Saguaro324February 03, 2019 03:30AM

  Re: I'm surprised that you think that way.

sfbayram249February 03, 2019 05:10AM

  Pain vs Injury

chunkmeister312February 02, 2019 07:56PM

  I'm hoping the concern expressed by the writers

waterfield343February 02, 2019 08:05PM

  Re: Some obvious thoughts about his "injury"

Rams43246February 02, 2019 08:22PM

  Another lame article

Ram49235February 02, 2019 07:31PM

  The "conclusion" of the article is based on a faulty, hidden premise

EternalHorns262February 02, 2019 08:22PM

  Re: Oh boy

cool_hand_luke221February 02, 2019 09:05PM

  Re: Oh boy

Rampage2K-224February 02, 2019 09:12PM

  Correct. There's no reporting of new information. Just an opinion. nm

Saguaro208February 03, 2019 03:15AM

  Precisely what it was meant to be (nm)

waterfield163February 03, 2019 09:29AM

  Then why that headline? nm.

Saguaro263February 03, 2019 09:55AM

  Re: Then why that headline? nm.

waterfield259February 03, 2019 10:59AM

  upper left above the article

21Dog166February 03, 2019 11:01AM

  Well, I guess it did it's job.

Saguaro182February 03, 2019 11:54AM

  Re: Well, I guess it did it's job.

waterfield239February 03, 2019 12:49PM

  Re: Well, I guess it did it's job.

Saguaro172February 03, 2019 12:52PM

  Who is that guy? Never heard of him

max234February 03, 2019 04:26AM

  Re: Who is that guy? Never heard of him

LMU93205February 03, 2019 04:40AM

  Re: Who is that guy? Never heard of him

max171February 03, 2019 04:46AM

  been a baseball beat writer......

21Dog175February 03, 2019 06:29AM

  The truth of the matter

waterfield211February 03, 2019 06:58AM