Just looking around the internet, your average Chiefs fan seems to think the Rams have had a soft schedule and have beaten "nobody." One poster said the Rams only beat the Chargers and Vikings because those teams "didn't have their mojo yet" (ahem, we played the Chargers after they did). Chiefs fans are extremely confident that they are going to beat us in MXC.
What do you think? Have we benefited from a "soft" schedule? Take off your blue and yellow sunglasses and tell me: who is really better, the Chiefs or the Rams?
Some facts below... (EDIT: fixed Chiefs' opponents W/L record)
RAMS (7-0) schedule to date@OAK (1-5) - W 33-13
ARZ (1-6) - W 34-0
LAC (5-2) - W 35-23
MIN (4-2) - W 38-31
@SEA (3-3) - W 33-31
@DEN (3-4) - W 23-20
@SF (1-6) - W 39-10
CHIEFS (6-1) schedule to date@LAC (5-2) - W 38-28
@PIT (3-2-1) - W 42-37
SF (1-6) - W 38-27
@DEN (3-4) - W 27-23
JAX (3-4) - W 30-14
@NE (5-2) - L 40-43
CIN (4-3) - W 45-10
Combined opponents' recordvs. RAMS = 18-28 (0.39%)
vs. CHIEFS = 24-23-1 (0.50%)
Average margin of victory:RAMS = +15.3
CHIEFS = +11.1
Average margin of victory over common opponents (LAC, SF, DEN)RAMS = +14.7
CHIEFS = +8.3
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/22/2018 11:53AM by EternalHorns.
