October 12, 2018 09:58AM
Quote
Ram Fan Teacher
I hear you but I think they said the photos were inconclusive on the TD. Well if you had a camera right down the backline and especially overhead (goal post area) you could easily make better and more precise calls. Cameras like that would have easily shown 2 steps out of bounds.

The technology is there so let's use it!

I believe that there were more than enough cameras to show the (non)-TD reception and the Gurley 1st down run.

Think about it. Typically, there are cameras positioned at the back of both end zones and on the side opposite of the regular TV sideline view. I believe the back end zone camera would have provided the definitive evidence to show that the Seahawk receiver was out of bounds. And the opposite field sideline camera would have shown if Gurley's knee was down or not (he wasn't close to being out of bounds which can sometimes be blocked by people). I believe that this was good 'ol fashioned network drama where Fox producers simply declined to show those angles (but they have to be there based upon previous low-level broadcasts).
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Why Not More Cameras?

Ram Fan Teacher296October 12, 2018 06:55AM

  Re: Why Not More Cameras?

Atlantic Ram283October 12, 2018 07:07AM

  Re: Why Not More Cameras?

Ram Fan Teacher132October 12, 2018 08:10AM

  Re: Why Not More Cameras?

Rams43151October 12, 2018 07:16AM

  Re: Why Not More Cameras?

Ram Fan Teacher81October 12, 2018 08:05AM

  Re: Why Not More Cameras?

Rams4374October 12, 2018 08:41AM

  Re: Why Not More Cameras?

Ram Fan Teacher74October 12, 2018 09:14AM

  Re: Why Not More Cameras?

ramBRO70October 12, 2018 09:58AM

  NHL does it a bit better

promomasterj169October 12, 2018 08:16AM

  Re: NHL does it a bit better

Ram Fan Teacher75October 12, 2018 09:17AM

  Either that or a SET number of cameras at EVERY game.

Ramgator63October 12, 2018 09:10AM