No, what I'm saying is that with those extra views, there would be less of a chance they could use the "not enough evidence" excuse. The only visual evidence we saw were from cameras quite a distance away from the end-zone backline. Even when you zoom in, you could argue that there was not enough evidence to overturn the touchdown (even though most of us disagree with that). With additional cameras in the areas I mentioned, the refs couldn't fallback on that excuse. It would be evident that his feet were out of the end zone.
