August 07, 2018 12:27PM
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
zn
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
zn
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
zn
Quote
Speed_Kills
Although it is true that Wade has traditionally valued edge rushers

I don’t like that AD is allowing himself to be used to reset the market

Is it "re-setting"?

In 2015 Suh's contract was 86% of the top qb's contract.

In 2016 it was similar with Von Miller.

In 2018, Von Miller's older deal, the highest for a defender, comes in at 63% of the top qb contract.

The market was already set for top defenders, it just regressed.

Give AD just 80% of the top qb's contract and it's 24 M. Which is not only NOT unreasonable, it doesn't even fully restore the market to what it already was for top defenders with Suh and Von Miller.

....

You keep ignoring the other factors behind Suh and Miller's contracts...

Suh was an actual free agent, who could go to the highest bidder....nuff said.

Miller was coming off a Super Bowl MVP and had already played his 5th year and was heading towards the franchise tag.

Donald is neither of those.

These are factors that need to be addressed when comparing the contracts.

No, those particular points have come up before, and I've answered them several times, and not even just on this board. Here goes again.

Of all the contracts signed this year, what difference did being "an actual free agent" make? Pick someone and explain. For example, Cooks was not a FA this year, Watkins was. They both got around 16 M. Strangely so did every WR who came up this year whether they were free agents or not.

Meanwhile, some more relevant facts.

Carr got 25 M. Wilson got 22 M (about). Yet Wilson had won a superbowl at that point and Carr has has had only 1 winning season, and has been in only one playoff game (which they lost). What explains the difference? Simple. Wilson came up in 2015 and Carr came up in 2017. That's it. That's the difference. Contracts go up and the year matters.

Plus of course of the existing "best defender" contracts, the 1st under the new CBA was Watt in 2014. He got 16.6 M. With that contract, he was the highest paid at his position at that point, for a few years anyway, and it was high in comparison to some top qbs too. He was not a free agent and he had never been to a superbowl.

If you dont; factor things like ALL that in, you're not talking about how 2nd contracts really work.

The year counts. Previous contracts count. Contracts increase. They increase by a fair percentage. If you are a team and you ignore all that you just cause yourself problems.

....

So let Donald hit free agency like Suh or even just finish his 5th year like Miller did if you want to reset or blow up the market....?

I wish you had read my post. I was pointing out he's not re-setting or blowing up the market. The market was already established. Not sure why that' s not clear yet. I also asked you to name any player who got more at a position simply because they were a free agent. (See that's a myth.) I pointed out that Cooks wasn't a free agent but he got basically the same as Watkins, who was. (And Gurley wasn't a free agent either and he now has the highest contract of any RB.) And they don't just pay superbowl winners. Ryan lost a superbowl and he's now the highest paid player in the league.

So as for your ideas of who gets paid, no one else who came up in his third year the way Donald did had to be a free agent superbowl winner either. Several players did what Donald did--1st rounders under the new CBA are allowed to re-negotiate after their 3rd year. That's what Watt did and Frederick too. Kuechly's another...there's more. In each case they came out of it as the highest paid player at their position when they did that. So there's nothing new or different about what AD is doing. There actually really is nothing in the league that corresponds with your view of how this works.

Just a reminder of that...no superbowls, no free agency, but they all got big contracts at the top of each position in question:

Quote

, [www.cbssports.com]

Teams giving highly-accomplished first-round picks extremely early extensions haven't exploited their leverage. Cowboys center Travis Frederick, Panthers inside linebacker Luke Kuechly, Cardinals cornerback Patrick Peterson and Texans defensive end J.J. Watt became the highest-paid player (by average year salary) at their respective positions. Each player received All-Pro honors in two of their first three year.

As for your list of Rams players to choose, I wondered why you did that. I mean a good team keeps all of its best talent. They do that, even if the fact that Cooks gets more than Gurley irrationally bugs some fan somewhere.


[ramsrule.com]

Read this yet?

Thanks for post that link. I don't know about zn but I hadn't read that yet and it is exactly what I was asking/talking about up above. Have you ever seen the NFL Positional Value Pyramid? Found here:

[www.arrowheadpride.com]

So that's what I'm asking/wondering about...impact per dollar, where do you put it? And how much is the position Donald plays worth, not how much is Donald worth. At any rate, the article you linked to was addressing this so now I will go back and read through that thread. Thanks again R2K
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Allbright on Donald

max1315August 06, 2018 03:53PM

  Re: Allbright on Donald...Not trading Donald.

oldschoolramfan397August 06, 2018 03:59PM

  I hear ya, but...

max504August 06, 2018 04:08PM

  Re: How stupid is Donald nm

Speed_Kills235August 06, 2018 05:20PM

  Re: Tell me exactly what they're offering...

dzrams566August 06, 2018 05:55PM

  Re: come in and do it the right way

Speed_Kills247August 07, 2018 03:01PM

  Pressure up the middle / relative value

BC Ramsfan260August 06, 2018 05:54PM

  Re: Pressure up the middle / relative value

AlbaNY_Ram304August 06, 2018 11:37PM

  agreed...AD is MORE valuable than Mack. imo

SunTzu_vs_Camus294August 07, 2018 08:40AM

  Agreed

Los Angeles Lenny190August 07, 2018 09:02AM

  An AD for Mack trade is intriguing...

Rams43323August 06, 2018 04:30PM

  Re: An AD for Mack trade is intriguing...

max277August 06, 2018 04:35PM

  Re: An AD for Mack trade is intriguing...

Rams43406August 06, 2018 04:43PM

  Re: An AD for Mack trade is intriguing...

dzrams393August 06, 2018 05:58PM

  Re: NOOOOOO.......Please No !

oldschoolramfan236August 06, 2018 06:19PM

  Re: NOOOOOO.......Please No !

Rams43216August 06, 2018 06:30PM

  Re: Sorry43........But it flippin' hot in SoCal.

oldschoolramfan205August 06, 2018 06:37PM

  Re: Sorry43........But it flippin' hot in SoCal.

Rams43268August 06, 2018 06:50PM

  Re: An AD for Mack trade is intriguing...

Rams43330August 06, 2018 06:28PM

  Re: Would you do it?

dzrams189August 06, 2018 06:41PM

  Re: Would you do it?

Rams43187August 06, 2018 06:54PM

  Re: Would you do it?

dzrams309August 06, 2018 07:01PM

  Re: Would you do it?

Rams43187August 06, 2018 07:03PM

  Re: No

RamsFanSinceLA231August 07, 2018 09:57AM

  Re: I'm with you!....(NM)

dzrams169August 07, 2018 10:13AM

  value of a player/ an hour glass really!

hammer213August 06, 2018 06:32PM

  Does Gruden like DT's?

Atlantic Ram199August 06, 2018 06:37PM

  Re: Does Gruden like DT's?

Ekern55332August 06, 2018 07:00PM

  Re: An AD for Mack trade is intriguing...

Barf33198August 06, 2018 07:56PM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

zn418August 06, 2018 04:45PM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

max237August 06, 2018 05:01PM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

zn230August 06, 2018 05:19PM

  Re: Donald still under contract

BumRap177August 07, 2018 03:20PM

  Re: Donald still under contract

zn177August 07, 2018 05:33PM

  Sour grapes?

BumRap181August 07, 2018 06:25PM

  Re: Sour grapes?

zn173August 07, 2018 06:56PM

  It makes no sense...

jemach197August 06, 2018 05:51PM

  I could see Mack getting traded to SF

BigGame81228August 06, 2018 05:10PM

  Re: 49'ers don't have much cap space anymore...

dzrams184August 06, 2018 06:48PM

  plus each organization hates each other

ferragamo79178August 07, 2018 08:13AM

  Guess I'll weigh in on AD... against my better instincts.

JamesJM253August 06, 2018 05:13PM

  Insanity peppers

alyoshamucci274August 06, 2018 05:24PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

Speed_Kills387August 06, 2018 05:28PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

zn218August 06, 2018 05:52PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

Rams43196August 06, 2018 06:35PM

  Re: That's precisely the point...

dzrams190August 06, 2018 06:40PM

  Re: That's precisely the point...

zn192August 06, 2018 06:49PM

  Re: That's precisely the point...

Rams43191August 06, 2018 07:01PM

  Re: That's precisely the point...

dzrams187August 06, 2018 07:05PM

  What is the value of the "position?"

ABQRam181August 07, 2018 08:07AM

  Re: How do you measure top 10 defense?

dzrams180August 07, 2018 08:13AM

  Re: How do you measure top 10 defense?

ABQRam175August 07, 2018 09:31AM

  Re: How do you measure top 10 defense?

dzrams168August 07, 2018 10:11AM

  Re: How do you measure top 10 defense?

ABQRam182August 07, 2018 10:33AM

  Re: How do you measure top 10 defense?

dzrams175August 07, 2018 10:44AM

  Re: How do you measure top 10 defense?

ABQRam340August 07, 2018 12:04PM

  Re: What is the value of the "position?"

zn314August 07, 2018 08:26AM

  Re: What is the value of the "position?"

Rampage2K-176August 07, 2018 08:50AM

  Re: What is the value of the "position?"

ABQRam187August 07, 2018 09:28AM

  Re: What is the value of the "position?"

zn266August 07, 2018 10:31AM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

Rampage2K-357August 06, 2018 08:16PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

zn316August 06, 2018 10:02PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

Rampage2K-194August 06, 2018 10:37PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

zn526August 07, 2018 12:21AM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

Rampage2K-183August 07, 2018 05:22AM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

ABQRam297August 07, 2018 12:27PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

dzrams184August 07, 2018 01:38PM

  Re: Yeah that part sounds fishy

zn312August 07, 2018 02:56PM

  Re: Insanity peppers

Steve199August 06, 2018 07:45PM

  +1 (nm)

LMU93158August 07, 2018 04:45AM

  I call BS...

jemach235August 06, 2018 05:50PM

  IF he's not then the answer is simple

RFIP216August 06, 2018 05:51PM

  Ya know...

jemach205August 06, 2018 05:53PM

  Re: I call BS......#metoo

Rampage2K-198August 06, 2018 07:16PM

  Re: +1

spagsbacker213August 06, 2018 10:14PM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

cool_hand_luke256August 06, 2018 08:25PM

  I don't like it..

sstrams312August 07, 2018 02:51AM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

David Deacon203August 07, 2018 04:30AM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

GroundPounder229August 07, 2018 04:34AM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

AlbaNY_Ram196August 07, 2018 06:01AM

  Re: Allbright on Donald

zn234August 07, 2018 07:22AM

  PHILLIPS on playing AD & Suh together

zn247August 07, 2018 08:40AM

  LOL, I think everybody who has 20 or more posts on this topic...

Saguaro220August 07, 2018 10:42AM

  Re: LOL, I think everybody who has 20 or more posts on this topic...

zn186August 07, 2018 10:46AM

  I have a scroll wheel blister from this, lol. nm.

Saguaro176August 07, 2018 10:48AM

  Re: I have a scroll wheel blister from this, lol. nm.

zn184August 07, 2018 10:56AM

  My last thoughts on Donald

DaJudge251August 07, 2018 02:21PM

  and for goodness sakes

ferragamo79370August 07, 2018 03:32PM