Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why the Rams Didn’t Bundle Picks to Trade Up

April 28, 2018 08:36PM
Quote
RamBill
Many called for the Rams to use some of the extra picks to trade up and were frustrated when it didn’t happen other than one time (the move to get OO)

After seeing what happened today, here’s my theory on why they actually traded down multiple times and up only once.

3 things first:

1) Trading requires a trading partner. As of now we don’t know if the Rams were attempting to trade up and couldn’t find any takers. Trade Les could probably have found takers if he was trying. He traded up once. I agree, everyone likes to say go get this guy or trade back, but what if htere are no partners? If you could get an honest answer out of Snead, he would say they missed on a guy or two, due to not being able to trade up.
2) You really can’t get very far trading 4th and 6th round picks.....certainly not up into the prime rounds (1-3) They're just not worth much in a trade up. yep, and trading future picks usually means taking 1 round off the future pick. IE a 2019 3rd rounder is a 2018 4th.
3) The Rams list of needs wasn’t that long: LB, OL, DL Yep, and I like the shotgun approach

I think the Rams calculated that bundling later round picks couldn't get them into a range where the players were significantly better than where their original picks were.....so they decided instead that they would use multiple picks on their primary need areas rather than trading them to move up. Their list of needs was short, so It gives them multiple swings at the plate at a few positions to find players who can contribute. Supporting this theory is that Les actually traded down multiple times, giving them even more picks. He wanted more picks, not fewer.

The result is they will have a lot of competition at those need positions....increasing the odds of hitting on some quality players.

They went for quantity over quality because they calculated that the quality difference wouldn't be that great between who they could have had a little higher, and who they actually ended up with.



Don't waste your time looking back, you're not going that way. - Ragnar Lothbrok
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Why the Rams Didn’t Bundle Picks to Trade Up

RamBill816April 28, 2018 08:17PM

  Re: Good post.......I can buy

RamFire500April 28, 2018 08:30PM

  Re: Snead took unnecessary risk....

spagsbacker367April 29, 2018 03:25AM

  Re: Snead took unnecessary risk....

zn353April 29, 2018 04:14AM

  Re: Snead took unnecessary risk....

Rampage2K-311April 29, 2018 07:37AM

  Re: Why the Rams Didn’t Bundle Picks to Trade Up

Deadpool382April 28, 2018 08:36PM

  Re: Why the Rams Didn’t Bundle Picks to Trade Up

cool_hand_luke343April 28, 2018 08:40PM

  I agree, and two more reasons

hubestar315April 28, 2018 10:09PM

  Re: Why the Rams Didn’t Bundle Picks to Trade Up

jemach290April 29, 2018 08:57AM