April 28, 2018 06:24PM
Quote
Billy_T
How many will start as rookies, or later?


I'm guessing that Kiser and Okoronkwo start as rookies. Noteboom starts in 2019, but I have a feeling the Rams won't settle on him for the long haul. They'll keep looking for an All-Pro at LT.

Allen will provide solid backup work for the Rams, but will never be a starter. He could stay with the team for a long time in just that manner.

I think Franklin and Joseph could stick as nice rotational pieces, but aren't really starters, either.

Kelly could make for a very nice caddy for Gurley, in the FFL sense of that word. He won't start unless Gurley leaves

Of course, I say the above without a real clue about most of these guys. I don't know enough about them to come close to good eval, which is why I ask the question in the first place. But if they get two starters out of this crop, drafting without the first two rounds, they've done very well. If others stick as depth, it's icing on the cake. Cooks, of course, is really like their first pick and he'll start. Peters and Talib are basically draft picks too. So that would be five starters from one draft, and that's excellent.

General rule of thumb for me? I think you should be able to get starters from the first three rounds, and a solid backup from the fourth. At least until you're so stacked with talent, you simply don't have the room anymore. Then, maybe it's just your first rounder that breaks through. I'd love to see the day when the Rams are that good.

A couple of notes. All IMO.

If Noteboom turns out not to be a decent left OT, he can be a guard or right OT. He won't just be jettisoned, not unless he crashes and burns.

I think that the Rams have at least 4 future starters there. The 2 you mention (and we agree), and maybe up to 2 OL. There's a couple more rotation/depth guys on among the DLs and LBs there too I think. Another consideration is that If anyone pans out at NT, Suh won't be a Ram forever.

I agree that Kelly is a 2A RB, but, he seems to be in line for the Thompson/Dunbar role, just a more tough and physical and less quick version. That's not a starter but it is IMO a "hit" (ie. if it works out that way). I would see that as more substantial than the way you put it but that's splitting hairs.



...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  How many starters did the Rams draft?

Billy_T965April 28, 2018 06:10PM

  Re: How many starters did the Rams draft?

zn453April 28, 2018 06:24PM

  Re: How many starters did the Rams draft?

Steve350April 28, 2018 08:39PM

  Re: How many starters did the Rams draft? imo

RamFire649April 28, 2018 06:28PM

  Re: How many starters did the Rams draft? imo

Steve272May 01, 2018 09:44AM

  Don't Forget

droopy396April 28, 2018 07:31PM

  Re: Don't Forget

3030352April 28, 2018 07:36PM

  Losing Watkins should net a 3rd rounder next year nm

chunkmeister280April 29, 2018 05:05AM

  You can say that...

jemach305April 29, 2018 05:04AM

  we used to draft starters

headslapper379April 28, 2018 07:32PM

  Interesting question and it can be interpreted in at least 3 ways...

Rams43359April 28, 2018 09:34PM

  If ANY, even just one of these guys start...is a very successful draft!!!!

SunTzu_vs_Camus353April 29, 2018 12:27AM

  Re: If ANY, even just one of these guys start...is a very successful draft!!!!

zn294April 29, 2018 03:39AM

  Re: If ANY, even just one of these guys start...is a very successful draft!!!!

Classicalwit294April 29, 2018 04:45AM

  Reality check...

max444April 29, 2018 04:22AM

  Re: Reality check...

zn321April 29, 2018 04:34AM

  Yes. I did notice...

max433April 29, 2018 04:42AM

  Re: Yes. I did notice...

zn281April 29, 2018 04:45AM

  Yeah, sure I won't argue that 4 is possible

max315April 29, 2018 04:57AM

  Isn't it great to have a draft that focuses on backups for a change?

NewMexicoRam274April 29, 2018 05:02AM

  more about role players and depth/development

ferragamo79270April 29, 2018 07:34AM

  Re: more about role players and depth/development

CraigMatson300April 29, 2018 08:28AM