Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Those are not "highlights"

April 06, 2018 12:31PM
people who live in glasses houses shouldnt throw stones.

in terms of the highlights..it most certainly is one. i dont care what view it is, its a single play and probably Watkins best play as a ram. its a highlight by definition. 1 play does not demonstrate consistency. any nfl player can and likely does have 1 good play on tape. its not like baldy went threw all of watskins tape. a production assistant found this "highlight" and told baldy to analyze it.

nerverthelss, i agree with baldy and have said many times i think the rams made a mistake by letting him go.

i also however agree with you that cooks for watkins is essentially i wash. i prefer watskins a little because of his size but cooks does exactly what mcvay wants.




Quote
Blue and Gold
Quote
PHDram
argue against using highlights to prove point as well as listening to "talking heads"?

Baldy uses the All-22 and he breaks down the protection, the route concept and the coverage and the throw. Baldy and Cosell are two of the "heads" that break down stuff and have spent their time at NFL Films watching the stuff.

The Cowherds, Baylesses, etc are the "talking heads" and they don't break down film.

As for what Baldy did, instead of people going personal, why don't they (a) agree with Baldy or (b) disagree with him and then say why they disagree.

Baldy confirmed what has been said by some about Watkins around here and totally blows away those who looked at the number of catches and yards and used that as a measuring stick of value.

The Chiefs looked at the film and gave Watkins big money. Reid is not stupid.

My view was this trade is a wash, Cooks will replace Watkins and will make, maybe, less money, maybe not in long run, I don't know. But the stats are not the factor it's the skill set and I said same thing as Baldy Watkins and Cooks are similar, Cooks, you get a bit more speed, Watkins, you get more strength and red zone abiity,.

So, it comes down to would you rather have Watkins and our 1st rounder this year or Cooks and a 4th rounder this year and a late 3rd next year?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Film Review: What will Brandin Cooks add to the Rams?

RamBill837April 06, 2018 05:24AM

  How Does Brandin Cooks Fit In With the Rams?

RamBill355April 06, 2018 05:31AM

  As much as I love the potential of Sammy Watkins

Los Angeles Lenny281April 06, 2018 02:36PM

  Rams should have used Watkins more on short passing game

Rams_81347April 06, 2018 09:39PM

  Re: Great, Great tutorial...

laram473April 06, 2018 05:36AM

  didnt you previously

PHDram339April 06, 2018 05:42AM

  Re: didnt you previously

Hollywood Ram372April 06, 2018 05:48AM

  Yup, I was at the Giants game last year, Sammy was a 1% player

max383April 06, 2018 06:29AM

  Those are not "highlights"

Blue and Gold360April 06, 2018 11:40AM

  Re: Those are not "highlights"

Ramsdude306April 06, 2018 11:48AM

  Re: Those are not "highlights"

PHDram366April 06, 2018 12:31PM

  Really?

Blue and Gold297April 06, 2018 12:40PM

  Re: Really?

PHDram264April 06, 2018 07:47PM

  Re: Great, Great tutorial...

Ramsdude679April 06, 2018 06:24AM

  Re: Great, Great tutorial... Attachments

Blue and Gold291April 06, 2018 02:16PM

  Excellent! Loved this! Except for at the 2:10 mark...

Ramadune454April 06, 2018 06:02AM

  Re: Excellent! Loved this! Except for at the 2:10 mark...

Ramsdude326April 06, 2018 06:27AM

  Re: Excellent! Loved this! Except for at the 2:10 mark...

RAMbler323April 06, 2018 08:33AM

  Re: Excellent! Loved this! Except for at the 2:10 mark...

Ramsdude277April 06, 2018 08:36AM

  Almost a balloon ball

Blue and Gold312April 06, 2018 11:41AM

  Re: Excellent! Loved this! Except for at the 2:10 mark...

cool_hand_luke277April 06, 2018 12:45PM

  Re: perspective Baldy on Ogeltree

shellback391April 06, 2018 12:48PM

  Re: Film Review: What will Brandin Cooks add to the Rams?

Classicalwit277April 08, 2018 08:35AM