Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I don't think so

March 28, 2018 04:26AM
Quote
zn
Quote
dzrams
Quote
zn
Quote
SunTzu_vs_Camus
Suh, OBJ, ADonald, MPeters???? Well, not Suh...but the other 3 if the OBJ trade is made. All tops at their position obviously.
....not counting TGII or Goff yet I guess.

I don't know how we can afford paying the top dollar to that many players....even tho they may be the best at their position.

btw-
Are the Rams loading up and signing like this cuz they know the CBA will be torn up in 3 seasons/after 2020?
Are we doin what Dallas/Wash/Philly?/etc did before the last CBA?? iirc...where they got fined for loading contracts with the CBA in mind or somethin...
I can't remember what happened but I thot they used the CBA to load up on contracts that was in "bad faith" somehow.

I don't thnk they can do 3 at that rate. Let's say the cap is 200 M in 2020. 60% of that is 120 M. Goff btw will be in the 30s, not the 20s. So let's say that Goff and Donald are 50+ M. That leaves 70 M for let's say 7 more players. You probably can;t squeeze another 20 M player into that. Or you can't without reducing the number of 60%ers you keep.

But here's the thing. I don't think the Rams are teambuilding in the traditional sense. Well they are but that's not all they're doing. I think in addition to developing a core of keepers, guys who end up being part of the 60%, they're also getting into doing year at a time rentals. So there's a chance they go through this every year. They aren't striving to build a team that includes Suh and Peters longterm. Every year though they want to add this or that difference maker, depending on opportunity.

I don't know about the Dallas etc. "bad faith" thing you refer to so I can;t comment on that.



...

Why do you lump in Peters with Suh? What tells you Peters is a rental and not part of the longterm plan?

You might be right. But either way there's only so many high second contract players they can keep.

Donald and Goff combined are going to be more than 50 M.

By the time Peters comes up for a 2nd contract, CBs of his caliber will be 17 M or more.

I don't even know if they can exercise a 5th year on him.

....

I agree with your first 3 statements. I don't know how they can fit all of them in.

Part of the problem is, it seems many are underestimating the future costs of Peters. Given that TruJ signed for $15M, I think he would have been at $17M in this market.

He could easily be a $20M player in 2020.

BTW, the Rams can exercise a 5th year option on him since the deadline hasn't passed. They have until May 3rd.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams 2020 $150M cap space in context

CeeZar713March 27, 2018 06:19AM

  Re: Rams 2020 $150M cap space in context

LMU93300March 27, 2018 09:55AM

  Re: Rams 2020 $150M cap space in context

Steve156March 27, 2018 10:28AM

  I would not be shocked...

Ramsfsninmd280March 27, 2018 11:01AM

  Re: I would not be shocked...

LMU93207March 27, 2018 11:26AM

  Rams have over $163M in cap space for 2020

AlbaNY_Ram236March 27, 2018 12:13PM

  and it might be more

zn186March 27, 2018 05:16PM

  ...do we have room to pay 20m to 3-4 players?

SunTzu_vs_Camus158March 28, 2018 01:56AM

  I don't think so

zn169March 28, 2018 03:15AM

  interesting...thnx on yer take

SunTzu_vs_Camus187March 28, 2018 04:02AM

  Re: interesting...thnx on yer take

zn142March 28, 2018 04:05AM

  cool...I'm not "that" out of it, then! LOL

SunTzu_vs_Camus122March 28, 2018 04:08AM

  Re: I don't think so

dzrams138March 28, 2018 04:08AM

  I lumped Suh in with everyone else...my mistake....Suh is the rental....

SunTzu_vs_Camus122March 28, 2018 04:15AM

  Re: I don't think so

zn207March 28, 2018 04:18AM

  Re: I don't think so

dzrams129March 28, 2018 04:26AM

  Re: I don't think so

zn297March 28, 2018 04:39AM

  LOL..."Merc" is waaaay cooler term!!!

SunTzu_vs_Camus109March 28, 2018 04:42AM

  remember they will replace players

ferragamo79187March 27, 2018 12:40PM

  Re: The cap is at $177M now...

dzrams210March 27, 2018 01:04PM

  Yep. Which is why giving up 2 First rounders for Beckham would be detrimental

RockRam133March 28, 2018 03:57AM