February 05, 2018 08:59AM
I thought helmet to helmet was illegal period.

I've no problem with it as I don't believe it was intended, just curious. If they're trying to cut down on concussions then that would make sense.



There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I thought that was a fantastic Super Bowl.

RamUK538February 05, 2018 03:23AM

  Re: Totally legal hit...NM

laram150February 05, 2018 04:44AM

  I'm fuzzy on the rule

RamUK170February 05, 2018 05:18AM

  Re: He was a "runner" at that point, not a defenseless receiver...NM

laram141February 05, 2018 05:29AM

  Re: He was a "runner" at that point, not a defenseless receiver...NM

RamsFanSinceLA114February 06, 2018 12:26PM

  Re: Totally legal hit...... by every rule that was legal

Rampage2K-193February 05, 2018 07:34AM

  I didn't think crown of the helmet to the chin was ever legal?

moklerman369February 05, 2018 07:41AM

  Re: I didn't think crown of the helmet to the chin was ever legal?

Rampage2K-191February 05, 2018 08:10AM

  Me neither

RamUK123February 05, 2018 08:59AM

  Well...I'm for...

JamesJM118February 05, 2018 09:51AM

  Re: Well...I'm for...

moklerman148February 05, 2018 10:24AM

  Re: it was entertainng

Speed_Kills119February 05, 2018 06:44AM

  I agree- loved it

LMU93156February 05, 2018 07:23AM

  agree....sucked me in quickly

ferragamo79122February 05, 2018 08:10AM

  Not the best SB but a nice spectacle

BumRap145February 05, 2018 12:30PM