Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: He was a "runner" at that point, not a defenseless receiver...NM

February 06, 2018 12:26PM
Exactly, and if that hit was illegal with him being a runner, then all helmet hits on running backs would be illegal too.



"He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions."
- Confucius

“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
- Patrick Rothfuss

"With age comes wisdom, but sometimes age comes alone."
- Oscar Wilde
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I thought that was a fantastic Super Bowl.

RamUK535February 05, 2018 03:23AM

  Re: Totally legal hit...NM

laram147February 05, 2018 04:44AM

  I'm fuzzy on the rule

RamUK168February 05, 2018 05:18AM

  Re: He was a "runner" at that point, not a defenseless receiver...NM

laram139February 05, 2018 05:29AM

  Re: He was a "runner" at that point, not a defenseless receiver...NM

RamsFanSinceLA112February 06, 2018 12:26PM

  Re: Totally legal hit...... by every rule that was legal

Rampage2K-188February 05, 2018 07:34AM

  I didn't think crown of the helmet to the chin was ever legal?

moklerman366February 05, 2018 07:41AM

  Re: I didn't think crown of the helmet to the chin was ever legal?

Rampage2K-190February 05, 2018 08:10AM

  Me neither

RamUK120February 05, 2018 08:59AM

  Well...I'm for...

JamesJM116February 05, 2018 09:51AM

  Re: Well...I'm for...

moklerman144February 05, 2018 10:24AM

  Re: it was entertainng

Speed_Kills115February 05, 2018 06:44AM

  I agree- loved it

LMU93151February 05, 2018 07:23AM

  agree....sucked me in quickly

ferragamo79120February 05, 2018 08:10AM

  Not the best SB but a nice spectacle

BumRap142February 05, 2018 12:30PM