Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Not so. It is exactly as Snead said: "saving dollars" is not the intent

January 11, 2018 07:08AM
It is NOT an issue of saving dollars, when it comes to possibly letting guys like TruJ or Watkins walk.
It is an issue of allocating those dollars to the right guys to maximize those dollars' effect, because the league sets an amount that you cannot exceed.

What good does it do to overpay 3 or 4 guys, not leaving yourself enough to pay for other positions.

The NFL has a hard cap. You can't exceed it and there is no magical way of getting around it.

Never that I ever recall have the Rams tried to be cheap to "save dollars". You've got to have enough to spread it around to get sufficient talent and depth.

This is what the Rams FO is wrestling with as we speak. And of course as fans and posters we might not agree with their choices.

As for Watkins: I think Snead will make a real run at keeping him so that he doesn't have to hear that he gave up a good young CB and a 2nd round pick to rent a player for year. But Demoff will be sure that keeping Watkins doesn't short them somewhere else. And therein lies the rub of it all.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

RamBill907January 10, 2018 05:10AM

  Well, Rams did with TruJ.

RockRam273January 10, 2018 05:23AM

  Re: Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

LMU93279January 10, 2018 05:58AM

  Re: Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

Headslap75341January 10, 2018 06:02AM

  Nope. No compensation for losing Sammy with Transition tag.

RockRam286January 10, 2018 06:10AM

  Re: Nope. No compensation for losing Sammy with Transition tag.

Headslap75285January 10, 2018 06:27AM

  Re: Its going to be tricky

Speed_Kills268January 10, 2018 06:38AM

  Re: Its going to be tricky

PHDram282January 10, 2018 07:49AM

  Re: I will say

Speed_Kills226January 10, 2018 09:44AM

  Re: I will say

oldschoolramfan397January 10, 2018 10:04AM

  lol

PHDram222January 10, 2018 10:27AM

  Re: lol

bigjimram21344January 10, 2018 11:33PM

  Re: Same thing I was saying........

oldschoolramfan206January 11, 2018 07:31AM

  Can't do that

AlbaNY_Ram371January 11, 2018 12:08AM

  You know, that non-exclusive tag makes a ton of sense to me...

Rams43306January 10, 2018 07:01AM

  Assuming the Franchise Tag cost about $16M/yr....

RAMbler286January 10, 2018 07:41AM

  Re: Assuming the Franchise Tag cost about $16M/yr....

oldschoolramfan340January 10, 2018 07:45AM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

merlin237January 10, 2018 09:19AM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

PHDram223January 10, 2018 01:22PM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

SoCalRAMatic314January 10, 2018 02:53PM

  trouble with transition tag

Anonymous User227January 10, 2018 10:59PM

  Re: oh I didn't realize that... do you mean the franchise tag? nm

Speed_Kills304January 10, 2018 09:46AM

  They both carry the same cost

AlbaNY_Ram260January 11, 2018 12:13AM

  Re: They both carry the same cost

Rams43304January 11, 2018 06:15AM

  Re: You know, that non-exclusive tag makes a ton of sense to me...

bigjimram21239January 10, 2018 11:46PM

  5 reasons to lock up Watkins

qwords273January 11, 2018 03:59AM

  Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

RockRam253January 11, 2018 04:50AM

  Re: Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

oldschoolramfan222January 11, 2018 05:06AM

  Re: Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

AlbaNY_Ram228January 11, 2018 05:25AM

  The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...

jemach245January 11, 2018 05:56AM

  Not so. It is exactly as Snead said: "saving dollars" is not the intent

RockRam260January 11, 2018 07:08AM

  Re: The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...Winner jemach.

oldschoolramfan234January 11, 2018 07:39AM

  +1 Je

ferragamo79199January 11, 2018 07:52AM

  Re: The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...

AlbaNY_Ram228January 11, 2018 09:12AM