Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I could see McVay moving on from Watkins...

January 10, 2018 07:44AM
Watkins underwhelmed this year. I think everybody would agree with that statement.

Some, including yours truly, have questioned his “want to” on some deeper passes. Two TD catches missed in the playoff game alone.

McVay’s O is always gonna be a spread it around type. Therefore, Watkins would never be getting his 10-15 targets in it.

I expect an increased emphasis on TE targets this year, adding one, if not two more receivers needing targets. This will further reduce Watkins opportunities.

Another speedy WR could be a legit deep threat to keep D’s honest. And for millions less than Watkins would cost.

Geez. Add all this up and one has to really think before signing a pricey extension for Watkins, at least in my mind.

I’m convinced that McVay will field a potent O this year either with or without Watkins.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2018 07:44AM by Rams43.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  The more I think about it, we might not need a big money Wide Out.

RockRam581January 10, 2018 05:08AM

  Re: The more I think about it, we might not need a big money Wide Out.

zn314January 10, 2018 05:39AM

  Re: I hear both of you - Its tricky

Speed_Kills232January 10, 2018 06:44AM

  Would like to see a good receiving TE and Sammy

Hazlet Hacksaw214January 12, 2018 02:53AM

  Re: and it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect

Speed_Kills234January 12, 2018 09:14AM

  I could see McVay moving on from Watkins...

Rams43263January 10, 2018 07:44AM

  Re: I could see McVay moving on from Watkins...

oldschoolramfan206January 10, 2018 07:50AM

  Re: The more I think about it, we might not need a big money Wide Out.

Classicalwit216January 11, 2018 07:52PM

  Re: that's the truth...

spagsbacker206January 12, 2018 03:18AM

  Re: that's the truth...

Classicalwit185January 12, 2018 05:16AM

  I think a legit deap threat WR is always needed

six2stack160January 12, 2018 08:01AM