Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

What?

January 07, 2018 10:51AM
Quote
BumRap
It’s not like Watkins is a one trick unless you believe that.

When have I ever said that? I explained that the Rams have a position for Watkins and that position prevents end arounds. Maybe McVay would explain why he likes Watkins on the line and why he thought Austin was better suited for the motion and jet sweep action.

He's the coach and he did pretty well
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Are the Rams built for

napoli556January 06, 2018 09:24PM

  1999

RFIP219January 07, 2018 03:47AM

  a Legit tight end solves a lot

ferragamo79166January 07, 2018 08:35AM

  The missing link in mcvay offense

Hazlet Hacksaw261January 07, 2018 09:15AM

  Re: The missing link in mcvay offense

six2stack159January 07, 2018 10:09AM

  Re: 1999

Rams43290January 07, 2018 09:28AM

  Re: Austin vs Watkins

BumRap150January 07, 2018 09:34AM

  Watkins was used as X. Cannot motion the X receiver

Blue and Gold240January 07, 2018 09:41AM

  To my point Watkins could have been used some

BumRap136January 07, 2018 10:12AM

  What?

Blue and Gold151January 07, 2018 10:51AM

  Re: What? agreed re McVay but

BumRap143January 07, 2018 12:43PM

  All I can say is

Blue and Gold152January 07, 2018 12:49PM

  Re: Are the Rams built for

GreatRamNTheSky194January 07, 2018 03:54AM

  great question

Blue and Gold182January 07, 2018 07:33AM

  Re: Are the Rams built for...totally disagree

BumRap161January 07, 2018 09:21AM

  Re: Are the Rams built for

XXXIVwin153January 07, 2018 11:49AM

  Re: Are the Rams built for

Rampage2K-163January 07, 2018 12:24PM