I was thinking the same thing.

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

January 02, 2018 09:24AM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 4,957
Status: HOF Inductee

They flagged the hit by Countess, but didn't flag the hit on Thomas.

I thought both hits were brutal, but were meant to separate the receiver from the ball..., which they did.

I also thought both hits were clean, and neither should have gotten a flag.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
TheThomas catch/no catch?	RFIP	537	January 01, 2018 10:26AM
Re: TheThomas catch/no catch?	Ramsdude	230	January 01, 2018 10:30AM
Re: TheThomas catch/no catch?	dodgerram	318	January 01, 2018 10:34AM
Re: TheThomas catch/no catch? I agree	BumRap	286	January 01, 2018 10:37AM
Re: TheThomas catch/no catch?	RFIP	311	January 01, 2018 11:00AM
Re: I think it was the fact he was not diving for the ball	BumRap	184	January 01, 2018 10:34AM
Re: TheThomas catch/no catch?	GreatRamNTheSky	372	January 01, 2018 10:37AM
Wanted to give the kicker a field goal attempt	The Professor	181	January 01, 2018 11:44AM
Maybe, but....	RAMbler	275	January 02, 2018 09:19AM
That was the argument. No catch or run/fumble out of bounds	stlramz	164	January 01, 2018 02:56PM
Re: TheThomas catch/no catch?	Ramsdude	314	January 01, 2018 10:41AM
I thought it was a catch but... (clear and obvious)	PeoriaRa	204	January 01, 2018 10:59AM
Who knows?	9er8er	200	January 01, 2018 10:45AM
I was thinking the same thing.	RAMbler	150	January 02, 2018 09:24AM
Clearly caught ball and took 2 steps	David Deacon	174	January 02, 2018 08:24AM
Yes, the league DOES have a big problem.	RockRam	209	January 02, 2018 09:07AM

Previous Message Next Message

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

RamsFootballFans.com Bucky's Pub The RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate Party Game Time Forum Help and Support Forum Jack Youngblood Chat Jim Everett Chat Kevin Demoff Chat Deacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&A Announcements Recent Messages