Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

December 30, 2017 10:21AM
I would trade for Watkins again and make it a priority to resign him. He has been excellent. The numbers arent there but the production definitely is there.

Watkins is always attacking the strength of the coverage. For example, versus the Titans LeBeau was running either a single high safety in a 5 under one deep look, or he was in thirds coverage. On the touchdown to Kupp, Watkins was assigned the responsibility of pulling the safety. Watkins lines up solo left, and run a streak up the left seam, the single high safety moves towards Watkins(towards his right). Kupp, on the right, runs the corner to the left. With no safety to contend with, Kupp has an easy one on one.

Additionaly, Goff is horribly inaccurate when throwing to Sammy. Sammy is open consistently. The other receivers are feeding off of his work.

Happy to put together a more detailed post if anyone is interested.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

Rams43898December 28, 2017 04:06PM

  Hindsight is 20/20 but... Gaines

ArizonaRamFan343December 28, 2017 04:09PM

  My understanding is Gaines has struggled...

jemach218December 29, 2017 06:37PM

  the options are too absolute

L.A.Rams281December 28, 2017 04:15PM

  people dont realize

ferragamo79304December 28, 2017 05:51PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

AlbaNY_Ram378December 28, 2017 07:04PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

Rams43222December 28, 2017 08:02PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

DudeRam268December 28, 2017 08:23PM

  Forget the 8 TDs...

jemach236December 29, 2017 01:38PM

  Don't forget them or give them too much weight

9er8er234December 29, 2017 01:50PM

  Re: Yeah I just don't agree with that assessment...

laram276December 29, 2017 02:16PM

  Great Points LA! nm

Ram Fan Teacher196December 29, 2017 02:28PM

  I haven't missed all that much

9er8er385December 29, 2017 02:43PM

  Re: Then color me confused....

laram244December 29, 2017 02:58PM

  Yeah, you are confused

9er8er227December 29, 2017 03:13PM

  Re: No you didn't...

laram209December 29, 2017 03:27PM

  Uh....

9er8er242December 29, 2017 03:41PM

  Re: Oh so that wasn't the case in Buffalo...

laram230December 29, 2017 03:52PM

  Nope, it wasn't

9er8er203December 29, 2017 04:04PM

  Re: Funny thing about that...

laram185December 30, 2017 10:10AM

  Re: Rams receiving targets...

laram206December 29, 2017 03:24PM

  Re: Rams receiving targets...

Rams43224December 29, 2017 03:36PM

  Here's what it tells me

9er8er215December 29, 2017 04:00PM

  Re: Would we be #1 in points scored without Watkins?

dzrams443December 28, 2017 10:07PM

  Most likely, yes

9er8er209December 29, 2017 11:46AM

  Re: Most likely, yes

dzrams196December 29, 2017 06:00PM

  The guy has been excellent, far more valuable than the numbers

Blue and Gold351December 29, 2017 12:05PM

  Devante Adams..

jemach234December 29, 2017 02:47PM

  Re: Rams have shot at SB, thus it is worth it...

spagsbacker246December 29, 2017 07:15PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

cool_hand_luke226December 30, 2017 10:21AM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

zn193December 30, 2017 10:29AM