Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Most likely, yes

December 29, 2017 06:00PM
Quote
9er8er
Watkins hasn't added anything any decent NFL WR couldn't have added. The "decoy' narrative doesn't hold water upon closer inspection. Their top two receivers this year, Gurley and Kupp, aren't benefiting by Watkins theoretically "drawing the other team's #1 CB" because they're not going to draw that guy anyway. And if the argument is that Woods benefited from that this season, why didn't that also hold true in previous seasons?

As it turns out, it's also not true that Watkins always drew the other team's top CB. Sometimes he did, other times he didn't. McVay's schemes are more responsible for who drew what coverage than anything else. At the end of the day, Watkins proved to be pretty much what he's always been in the NFL. Overrated and imminently replaceable.

You can believe that if you want, I'm not buying it.

I've seen enough in the games and review of stills to know he has a major impact.

It's not just about who draws the #1 CB but that is a big part of it. It's true that he didn't always draw the #1 CB but he does the vast majority of the time.

But possibly more importantly, and something you failed to mention at all, is how his presence helps free up the others. The vast majority of the time, when the safety has a choice of who to double, he chooses Watkins thus allowing Woods and Kupp to have single coverage.

To their credit they often take advantage of that and make the play but but Watkins had impact by drawing the D attention.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

Rams43898December 28, 2017 04:06PM

  Hindsight is 20/20 but... Gaines

ArizonaRamFan343December 28, 2017 04:09PM

  My understanding is Gaines has struggled...

jemach218December 29, 2017 06:37PM

  the options are too absolute

L.A.Rams281December 28, 2017 04:15PM

  people dont realize

ferragamo79304December 28, 2017 05:51PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

AlbaNY_Ram378December 28, 2017 07:04PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

Rams43222December 28, 2017 08:02PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

DudeRam268December 28, 2017 08:23PM

  Forget the 8 TDs...

jemach236December 29, 2017 01:38PM

  Don't forget them or give them too much weight

9er8er234December 29, 2017 01:50PM

  Re: Yeah I just don't agree with that assessment...

laram276December 29, 2017 02:16PM

  Great Points LA! nm

Ram Fan Teacher195December 29, 2017 02:28PM

  I haven't missed all that much

9er8er385December 29, 2017 02:43PM

  Re: Then color me confused....

laram244December 29, 2017 02:58PM

  Yeah, you are confused

9er8er227December 29, 2017 03:13PM

  Re: No you didn't...

laram209December 29, 2017 03:27PM

  Uh....

9er8er242December 29, 2017 03:41PM

  Re: Oh so that wasn't the case in Buffalo...

laram230December 29, 2017 03:52PM

  Nope, it wasn't

9er8er203December 29, 2017 04:04PM

  Re: Funny thing about that...

laram184December 30, 2017 10:10AM

  Re: Rams receiving targets...

laram206December 29, 2017 03:24PM

  Re: Rams receiving targets...

Rams43224December 29, 2017 03:36PM

  Here's what it tells me

9er8er215December 29, 2017 04:00PM

  Re: Would we be #1 in points scored without Watkins?

dzrams443December 28, 2017 10:07PM

  Most likely, yes

9er8er209December 29, 2017 11:46AM

  Re: Most likely, yes

dzrams195December 29, 2017 06:00PM

  The guy has been excellent, far more valuable than the numbers

Blue and Gold351December 29, 2017 12:05PM

  Devante Adams..

jemach234December 29, 2017 02:47PM

  Re: Rams have shot at SB, thus it is worth it...

spagsbacker246December 29, 2017 07:15PM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

cool_hand_luke226December 30, 2017 10:21AM

  Re: In a hypothetical do-over, do we trade for Watkins?

zn193December 30, 2017 10:29AM