Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

That's the point; whether he did or did not has nothing to do with it

November 05, 2017 03:01AM
This is the point I'm attempting to make.
The issue is not guilt or innocence. Elliott may be a choir boy.
The issue is that a negotiated CBA gave Goodell the right to do what he did as far as discipline. This has been tested in court on numerous ocassions (the latest being Tom Brady), and upheld.

What Goodell did has more to do with punishing Elliott for projecting an image that, in Goodell's view, is harmful to the business interests of the NFL as to whether Elliott actually did something bad (as defined by law or provable in court) or to what extent.

You may not like that; I might not like that. But the Union and the NFL negotiated that in a contract and the Union wants to change it by finding activist Judges who think they have the right to impose any standard of social "fairness" that they believe in, retroactively, into a previously negotiated contract.

The NFL gave up some things and the Union gave up some things to come to a CBA. That's how it works.

It is unethical for the Union to keep using the Court system to try to overturn parts of the CBA they don't like, now, long after coming to an agreement. And it is just as wrong for Judges to keep granting stays for Elliott just because his lawyers ask for them. The idea that activist Judges have now decided that they are the ultimate arbiters of social fairness, as opposed to being authorized referees in determining whether a law or contract is legal or a person has transgressed the law, is not just undermining the CBA, it is undermining the fabric of our nation and causing tremendous ambiguity and confusion.

And that's why this entire thing is so distasteful to me.
And it's also why these Anthem protests are disgusting to me and must be stopped. What is it exactly that they are protesting and using NFL games as a free platform? It is that they want some undefined vision of "fairness" that they hold, outside of law and contracts, to be imposed on other people. And the irony of it is that these players are very well to do men, the least of them making $10,000 per WEEK!! They act as though they are working for one of Carngie's steel mills in the 20's and being treated like animals and barely surviving a subsistance wage.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  It's ridiculous that Ezekiel Elliott is again allowed to play this Sunday

RockRam857November 03, 2017 06:18AM

  Money talks

Speedball89277November 03, 2017 07:15AM

  Things change

NewMexicoRam264November 03, 2017 07:25AM

  One of the NFL's worst years in history

Ram49331November 03, 2017 10:39AM

  Re: One of the NFL's worst years in history

max360November 03, 2017 11:40AM

  Re: One of the NFL's worst years in history

waterfield315November 03, 2017 01:14PM

  Please define "violence"

RockRam253November 03, 2017 01:46PM

  Re: For me

RamsFanSinceLA235November 03, 2017 02:26PM

  Officiating. Not sure that it is any better/worse than in years past.

RockRam265November 03, 2017 02:40PM

  Re: Please define "violence"

waterfield235November 03, 2017 02:33PM

  Violence?

Classicalwit285November 05, 2017 11:33AM

  Re: It's ridiculous that Ezekiel Elliott is again allowed to play this Sunday

bigjimram21254November 04, 2017 10:22PM

  accusations

wv ram187November 05, 2017 02:21AM

  That's the point; whether he did or did not has nothing to do with it

RockRam181November 05, 2017 03:01AM

  ok

wv ram167November 05, 2017 04:33AM

  I get your point, but respectfully "justice" plays no role in this

RockRam167November 05, 2017 04:57AM

  Re: I get your point, but respectfully "justice" plays no role in this

Ramboni199November 05, 2017 05:42AM

  Re: Protesting

BumRap184November 05, 2017 04:35AM

  This is a good point to.....

Anonymous User170November 05, 2017 04:52AM

  OK. Sorry didn't see this before my next reply. (nm)

RockRam153November 05, 2017 05:16AM

  I don't think so; I think that's a Red Herring approach.

RockRam180November 05, 2017 05:15AM