October 18, 2017 05:47PM
Quote
zn
Quote
dzrams
Or you could say, "I don't care. Fisher didn't do as well as McVay would have or other coaches under the same or similar circumstances."

I.e. He didn't maximize the talent he DID have. This is of course what Demoff said after Fisher's termination.

McVay has never been under those particular circumstances.

In fact name examples of anyone who has and who did well.

I've asked that for years. No answer. A few attempts at an answer that did not hold up because the responder didn't account for everything I said.

And yes he maximized the talent he DID have. I would say that going 7-9 etc under those conditions is doing well considering.

Again...unless you can name someone who did better under the specific conditions I named.

....

An opinion is an opinion.

Mine - and apparently Demoff's since he's the one who said they didn't maximize their talent - feels that he should have done better despite the obvious hardships he faced.

I know you feel differently which is ok. Let's agree to disagree.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  McVay that good or Fisher that bad

RounderRick1178October 17, 2017 06:19PM

  I agree with the 2 guys on the show NM

six2stack515October 17, 2017 06:20PM

  different philosophies

FootballGenius515October 17, 2017 06:30PM

  I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

Los Angeles Lenny392October 17, 2017 07:02PM

  Re: I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

waterfield370October 17, 2017 08:23PM

  Is that the guy

RamUK327October 18, 2017 05:44PM

  Re: I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

Classicalwit302October 19, 2017 04:13AM

  lol

Los Angeles Lenny314October 19, 2017 09:35AM

  Re: McVay that good or Fisher that bad

Rams43333October 17, 2017 07:12PM

  Both nm

XXXIVwin319October 17, 2017 07:27PM

  The Jag win was Fishball

Blue and Gold604October 17, 2017 08:32PM

  Re: The Jag win was Fishball

CraigMatson316October 17, 2017 11:40PM

  I don't agree with the label of Fishball

RockRam335October 18, 2017 02:11AM

  You have your definition, I have mine

Blue and Gold310October 18, 2017 02:14AM

  one difference

zn370October 18, 2017 03:22AM

  Re: You have your definition, I have mine

JYB422October 19, 2017 07:47AM

  Re: I don't agree with the label of Fishball

guinnessram312October 18, 2017 11:22AM

  Excellent post sorta changed my...

BumRap307October 20, 2017 07:36AM

  one key difference

Los Angeles Lenny300October 18, 2017 04:38AM

  Re: The Jag win was Fishball

21Dog279October 18, 2017 04:39AM

  Yeah, it's not the normal game by McVay

Blue and Gold309October 18, 2017 02:19PM

  McVay is trending downwards

Rams_81511October 18, 2017 02:50AM

  McVay has met a dose of reality

NewMexicoRam420October 18, 2017 02:54AM

  Really? Based on a couple of games?

RockRam367October 18, 2017 03:39AM

  Re: Really? Based on a couple of games?

Rams43275October 18, 2017 07:29AM

  Yes boxing each player into specific roles

Rams_81321October 19, 2017 04:49PM

  Seriously?

RamFanEsq327October 18, 2017 05:44AM

  It is not the results but the manner of the regression

Rams_81323October 19, 2017 04:50PM

  Agreed

FootballGenius287October 18, 2017 02:37PM

  Rams are a play or two from being UNDEFEATED!

Ramgator340October 18, 2017 03:52AM

  Well said.

RockRam523October 18, 2017 05:10AM

  Re: Well said...4-2 is Perfect!!!!

oldschoolramfan320October 18, 2017 05:52AM

  The game passed him by

Los Angeles Lenny334October 18, 2017 05:00AM

  Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

psxpaul376October 18, 2017 09:45AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

Rams43342October 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

Rampage2K-321October 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Agreed, for all Fisher's (many!) faults, he built well.

ArizonaRamFan304October 18, 2017 02:53PM

  Re:or snead did nm

VANRAM384October 18, 2017 05:12PM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

dzrams449October 18, 2017 11:02AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

RAMSINCE ARNETT325October 18, 2017 12:05PM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

waterfield344October 18, 2017 12:10PM

  it gets down to one thing

zn425October 18, 2017 05:15PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

VANRAM322October 18, 2017 05:24PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

zn298October 18, 2017 05:31PM

  Re: other things can be said...

dzrams304October 18, 2017 05:34PM

  Re: other things can be said...

zn328October 18, 2017 05:40PM

  Re: other things can be said...

dzrams325October 18, 2017 05:47PM

  Re: other things can be said...

zn322October 18, 2017 05:50PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

VANRAM320October 18, 2017 08:26PM

  ceilings

wv ram260October 18, 2017 05:25PM

  Re: ceilings

zn326October 18, 2017 05:37PM

  Fisher was not bad on defense or special teams

Rams_81270October 19, 2017 04:51PM

  Mcvay=looking good so far. Fishface= proven terrible.

guinnessram285October 18, 2017 11:24AM

  I thought Last Sunday was more reminiscent of MartyBall

six2stack336October 18, 2017 12:06PM

  I agree with that analogy

Los Angeles Lenny258October 19, 2017 11:36AM

  Re: McVay that good or Fisher that bad

AZRamsfan65315October 20, 2017 07:18AM