Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I don't agree with the label of Fishball

October 18, 2017 02:11AM
The game plan was to run the ball using a star running back against a team who has the #1 pass defense, but a considerably less proficient run defense.

The week before, Pittsburgh seemed to ignore the film and the stats and put the ball up 55 times! The outcome was predictable: 5 INT's and a lopsided loss to the Jags.

Rams stuck to the obvious proper strategy and won.

Fishball is not conservative: Fishball is playing not to lose. Fishball is hanging around until the 4th quarter, kicking a FG, and then holding on for dear life. Fishball is playing scared and believing that your own offense is the unit most likely to let you down.

McVay does NOT play Fishball, ever. He does not play not to lose; he plays to win.

Running the ball and less passing was the proper strategic balance against the Jags D. That might be conservative to some, but it is certainly not Fishball. Even being extra careful not to turn it over in the passing game was necessary because the Jag's pass D and their secondary is so darn good.

Fisher would play not to lose against Lompoc High. That's just his nature.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/18/2017 02:15AM by RockRam.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  McVay that good or Fisher that bad

RounderRick1173October 17, 2017 06:19PM

  I agree with the 2 guys on the show NM

six2stack512October 17, 2017 06:20PM

  different philosophies

FootballGenius511October 17, 2017 06:30PM

  I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

Los Angeles Lenny388October 17, 2017 07:02PM

  Re: I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

waterfield367October 17, 2017 08:23PM

  Is that the guy

RamUK327October 18, 2017 05:44PM

  Re: I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

Classicalwit301October 19, 2017 04:13AM

  lol

Los Angeles Lenny312October 19, 2017 09:35AM

  Re: McVay that good or Fisher that bad

Rams43333October 17, 2017 07:12PM

  Both nm

XXXIVwin317October 17, 2017 07:27PM

  The Jag win was Fishball

Blue and Gold603October 17, 2017 08:32PM

  Re: The Jag win was Fishball

CraigMatson315October 17, 2017 11:40PM

  I don't agree with the label of Fishball

RockRam333October 18, 2017 02:11AM

  You have your definition, I have mine

Blue and Gold307October 18, 2017 02:14AM

  one difference

zn368October 18, 2017 03:22AM

  Re: You have your definition, I have mine

JYB420October 19, 2017 07:47AM

  Re: I don't agree with the label of Fishball

guinnessram308October 18, 2017 11:22AM

  Excellent post sorta changed my...

BumRap305October 20, 2017 07:36AM

  one key difference

Los Angeles Lenny298October 18, 2017 04:38AM

  Re: The Jag win was Fishball

21Dog278October 18, 2017 04:39AM

  Yeah, it's not the normal game by McVay

Blue and Gold306October 18, 2017 02:19PM

  McVay is trending downwards

Rams_81510October 18, 2017 02:50AM

  McVay has met a dose of reality

NewMexicoRam417October 18, 2017 02:54AM

  Really? Based on a couple of games?

RockRam365October 18, 2017 03:39AM

  Re: Really? Based on a couple of games?

Rams43275October 18, 2017 07:29AM

  Yes boxing each player into specific roles

Rams_81319October 19, 2017 04:49PM

  Seriously?

RamFanEsq325October 18, 2017 05:44AM

  It is not the results but the manner of the regression

Rams_81321October 19, 2017 04:50PM

  Agreed

FootballGenius287October 18, 2017 02:37PM

  Rams are a play or two from being UNDEFEATED!

Ramgator340October 18, 2017 03:52AM

  Well said.

RockRam520October 18, 2017 05:10AM

  Re: Well said...4-2 is Perfect!!!!

oldschoolramfan317October 18, 2017 05:52AM

  The game passed him by

Los Angeles Lenny331October 18, 2017 05:00AM

  Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

psxpaul375October 18, 2017 09:45AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

Rams43340October 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

Rampage2K-320October 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Agreed, for all Fisher's (many!) faults, he built well.

ArizonaRamFan301October 18, 2017 02:53PM

  Re:or snead did nm

VANRAM381October 18, 2017 05:12PM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

dzrams447October 18, 2017 11:02AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

RAMSINCE ARNETT325October 18, 2017 12:05PM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

waterfield343October 18, 2017 12:10PM

  it gets down to one thing

zn423October 18, 2017 05:15PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

VANRAM320October 18, 2017 05:24PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

zn298October 18, 2017 05:31PM

  Re: other things can be said...

dzrams301October 18, 2017 05:34PM

  Re: other things can be said...

zn326October 18, 2017 05:40PM

  Re: other things can be said...

dzrams325October 18, 2017 05:47PM

  Re: other things can be said...

zn320October 18, 2017 05:50PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

VANRAM318October 18, 2017 08:26PM

  ceilings

wv ram258October 18, 2017 05:25PM

  Re: ceilings

zn325October 18, 2017 05:37PM

  Fisher was not bad on defense or special teams

Rams_81267October 19, 2017 04:51PM

  Mcvay=looking good so far. Fishface= proven terrible.

guinnessram283October 18, 2017 11:24AM

  I thought Last Sunday was more reminiscent of MartyBall

six2stack333October 18, 2017 12:06PM

  I agree with that analogy

Los Angeles Lenny256October 19, 2017 11:36AM

  Re: McVay that good or Fisher that bad

AZRamsfan65313October 20, 2017 07:18AM