Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Your memory is much better than mine.

October 07, 2017 05:43AM
I had to go back and look up info on those seasons in order to be reminded about what happened.

What I DO remember about the 1995 Rich Brooks 4-0 start is that it was fueled almost entirely by that Rams team committing NO turnovers while receiving many from their opponents. That was the big story of that start.

Whether that was luck or design, it didn't continue, and once they weren't lopsidedly winning the TO battle, they were revealed as a very ordinary team.

And Rich Brooks just wasn't able to make the jump from successful college coach to NFL coach.

I see that they lost twice that season to the division winner 11-5 SF 9er's, and the niners scored 40+ points both times.

----

In 2006, they had a terrible draft. Tye Hill, Joe Kloppy, Claude Wroten. Nothing like the bounty they have reaped in 2017.

Bulger had a good season, and they threw a ton of passes to Jackson out of the backfield. More than he ever got before or since. I always wondered why Linehan went away from that.

There's a similarity there to how the Rams are using Gurley.

But as in 1995, they lost twice to the eventual Division winner - Seattle this time.

The similarity ends between Linehan and McVay. Right from the beginning, I thought Linehan defined the word "milquetoast". A good offensive mind, but just not a leader of men.

---

So you bring up some interesting examples and we shall see. Like I said, this game will be a big proof to me. I don't see the 9ers or Cards being division winners this year. I think it's the Rams or the Seahawks. Tomorrow will determine which of the two has at least a chance to sweep the other.



Ramily!
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  2006 Rams started 4-1

Speed_Kills812October 06, 2017 03:54PM

  Re: 2006 Rams started 4-1

zn531October 06, 2017 04:09PM

  Re: 2006 Rams started 4-1

GlacieRam359October 06, 2017 04:22PM

  Re: 2006 Rams started 4-1

zn329October 06, 2017 04:30PM

  Great anaology

ferragamo79300October 06, 2017 05:09PM

  We love ya ..yeah ,yeah, yeah..

RAMSINCE ARNETT320October 07, 2017 05:36AM

  That's perfect...

Guard380October 07, 2017 07:00AM

  Re: 2006 Rams started 4-1

SB34RAMS1476October 06, 2017 05:21PM

  Re: 2006 Rams started 4-1

Steve301October 06, 2017 10:23PM

  You can make the playoffs with Meet The Beatles

max263October 07, 2017 05:49AM

  Re: You can make the playoffs with Meet The Beatles

zn302October 07, 2017 06:01AM

  It's not about patience for me, its about what ends up happening.

max242October 07, 2017 07:50AM

  milli vanilli ?

wv ram251October 07, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: milli vanilli ?

zn282October 07, 2017 06:55AM

  Negative ghost rider, we have arrived!

Los Angeles Lenny356October 06, 2017 04:56PM

  I wouldn't say "a long way from proving anything"

Saguaro339October 06, 2017 06:28PM

  Re: Ok. Fair enough

Speed_Kills348October 06, 2017 10:36PM

  Your memory is much better than mine.

Saguaro262October 07, 2017 05:43AM

  Re: Saguaro, Seattle, and the rough road ahead

leafnose314October 07, 2017 06:14AM

  Re: Saguaro, Seattle, and the rough road ahead

zn469October 07, 2017 06:46AM

  Reminds me of another turn-around season--1999

NewMexicoRam270October 07, 2017 07:13AM

  And what do you remember?

Old Goat268October 06, 2017 06:46PM

  This season is a false equivalent to..

RAMSINCE ARNETT249October 07, 2017 05:33AM

  Re: 2006 Rams started 4-1

MamaRAMa272October 07, 2017 07:26AM

  Re: 2006 Rams started 4-1

zn277October 07, 2017 07:43AM

  Re: yup

Speed_Kills364October 07, 2017 10:33AM

  2006 Rams start was fools gold

LMU93260October 07, 2017 07:38AM

  What are you looking for them to prove?

RamFanEsq381October 07, 2017 08:51AM

  That they are focused on themselves...

JamesJM290October 07, 2017 09:05AM

  Re: Yes sir nm

Speed_Kills333October 07, 2017 10:29AM

  Re: That they are focused on themselves...

RamFanEsq234October 07, 2017 07:21PM

  Re: That they are focused on themselves...

SoCalRAMatic251October 08, 2017 06:49AM