August 12, 2017 03:16PM
It may be, and probably is, nothing more than they simply valued Watkins to bolster the WR corps over CB depth.

The Bills needed and wanted a CB because they were trading Darby to the Eagles. That's what the Rams needed to give to get.

But you're on record that you like the CB depth right now. I'm on record saying it's thin. We'll start to find out soon enough.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  To Those Who Oppose the Sammy Watkins Trade

droopy725August 12, 2017 01:36PM

  Re: To Those Who Oppose the Sammy Watkins Trade

ramBRO271August 12, 2017 01:48PM

  I wasn't thrilled at 1st, but...

six2stack271August 12, 2017 02:10PM

  Re: I wasn't thrilled at 1st, but...

Classicalwit247August 12, 2017 02:25PM

  Re: I wasn't thrilled at 1st, but...

reggae225August 12, 2017 02:41PM

  They gave up more than a 2nd rounder

9er8er290August 12, 2017 02:39PM

  Re: Not quite...

dzrams228August 12, 2017 02:46PM

  Okay

9er8er253August 12, 2017 02:51PM

  Re: Okay

dzrams216August 12, 2017 03:07PM

  Not necessarily

9er8er176August 12, 2017 03:16PM

  Re: To Those Who Oppose the Sammy Watkins Trade

kfriel397August 12, 2017 02:50PM

  I think Bills fans liking the trade

9er8er245August 12, 2017 03:09PM

  Uh, No.

Saguaro369August 12, 2017 03:39PM

  Uh...yes

9er8er212August 12, 2017 04:12PM

  I gave you their gut reaction.

Saguaro219August 12, 2017 04:17PM

  LOL

9er8er177August 12, 2017 04:25PM

  Re: LOLololol.

Saguaro182August 12, 2017 04:32PM

  Re: I think Bills fans liking the trade

socalmab361August 12, 2017 04:49PM

  Re: To Those Who Oppose the Sammy Watkins Trade

Classicalwit283August 12, 2017 02:27PM

  Re: To Those Who Oppose the Sammy Watkins Trade

reggae258August 12, 2017 02:37PM