Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: if Thomas is good he's good (and for me, add....period)

August 08, 2017 07:05AM
Quote
zn
Quote
RAMSINCE ARNETT
Quote
Rams43
Quote
FootballGenius
After the suspension but with the way McVay has been talking about him it sure seems like they have plans for him.

Maybe McVay needs him, more than wants him, FG.

McVay wants and needs a deep threat. Tavon doesn't look like he's it.

Reynolds is a rookie and currently nursing a hamstring.

None of our other likely keepers look like true deep threats.

Sooooo...

By a process of elimination McVay finds that he needs to accommodate Thomas a little bit. Okay, more than a little bit.

For at least this first season. Lol.

That's my theory, anyway.

That's our situation a suspended 6th round pick holds the key to opening up our offense.

Not a religious man but I feel the need for prayer. LOL

Over 50 years of this still can't believe it.

Well I think all that's exaggerated myself.

I dont think the fact that Thomas was suspended means anything in terms of real analysis of what he brings. So I don't put it like you. Instead I go "hmm looks like Thomas is coming around as a good player, too bad he will miss 4 games."

The key to an offense, even this offense, is not its deep threat. There have been good offenses without a dedicated deep threat. You don't need a dedicated deep threat role player to throw long. You can set up a deep threat by using play action and scheming a guy open. If Thomas is a good dedicated deep threat role player, that's good and it helps, but it is not the be all and end all.

Plus again for me the fact that he is suspended does not enter into my ideas of him at all. He's good or he's not. If he is then there's no asterisk for the suspension. Yeah it's too bad he will miss 4 games but then as I said that is not the end of the world.

IF this offense absolutely needs a dedicated deep threat role player or it's doomed, then it's not a very good offensive scheme in the first place.


.....

Well said, zn, and I agree with all of that.

I hope I didn't give the wrong impression about Thomas in my earlier post.

I like Thomas (if his hands problem is cleaned up).

I would love to see Thomas make this roster. Even start, for that matter.

I don't really have an axe to grind regarding which receivers make the 53. Heck, I just want the best six.

Or seven, lol.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Nice WR depth chart post by Merlin...

Rams43995August 07, 2017 02:51PM

  Agree about Thomas. And its out of desperation

max406August 07, 2017 04:19PM

  Re: Agree about Thomas. And its out of desperation

tonyde247August 08, 2017 12:11PM

  Re: Nice WR depth chart post by Merlin...

zn296August 07, 2017 05:24PM

  Re: Nice WR depth chart post by Merlin...

FootballGenius278August 08, 2017 06:57AM

  I figured Thomas was history...

FootballGenius294August 07, 2017 05:29PM

  Re: I figured Thomas was history...

Rams43308August 07, 2017 05:58PM

  friendly disagreement

zn286August 07, 2017 06:28PM

  Re: I figured Thomas was history...Agreed

RAMSINCE ARNETT269August 08, 2017 06:23AM

  if Thomas is good he's good (and for me, add....period)

zn461August 08, 2017 06:46AM

  Re: if Thomas is good he's good (and for me, add....period)

Rams43249August 08, 2017 07:05AM

  Re: if Thomas is good he's good (and for me, add....period)

FootballGenius244August 08, 2017 09:07AM

  McVay has been just short of giddy about Thomas

RockRam392August 08, 2017 07:11AM

  Re: McVay has been just short of giddy about Thomas

Rams43238August 08, 2017 08:13AM

  Re: I figured Thomas was history...and I did too....

leafnose230August 08, 2017 05:33PM

  Re: I figured Thomas was history...and I did too....

zn288August 08, 2017 06:07PM

  That's how I see it

reggae265August 07, 2017 06:27PM

  Spruce

LMU93462August 08, 2017 04:22AM

  Re: Spruce

RAMSINCE ARNETT356August 08, 2017 06:39AM

  Re: Minor Disagreement

RamsFanSince69282August 08, 2017 07:09AM