Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Correct, FG

June 07, 2017 08:41AM
We've got enough up-and-comers in the WR corp without having to divide the reps among EVEN MORE players. It is my opinion that as it stands, the Rams will have to cut at least one and maybe 2+ promising WR to form the final 53. I strongly doubt *any* of the cut receivers is out of football, barring serious injury.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/07/2017 08:42AM by ArizonaRamFan.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Eric Decker anyone?

no name936June 06, 2017 06:27PM

  Re: Why is he a perfect McV offense guy?..NM

laram452June 06, 2017 06:54PM

  Same type of player as Kupp

FootballGenius442June 06, 2017 08:55PM

  Correct, FG

ArizonaRamFan333June 07, 2017 08:41AM

  Same player as Kupp 3rd Post FBGenius? Welcome 2Herd

Anonymous User419June 07, 2017 03:59PM

  Re: Same player as Kupp 3rd Post FBGenius? Welcome 2Herd

FootballGenius361June 07, 2017 07:11PM

  Re: Same player as Kupp 3rd Post FBGenius? Welcome 2Herd

SoCalRAMatic356June 07, 2017 10:40PM

  Don't think an older WR is the right answer at this time.

RockRam481June 07, 2017 12:47AM

  Re: Don't think an older WR is the right answer at this time.

LMU93512June 07, 2017 03:16AM

  too much salary for a trade

snowman329June 07, 2017 08:14AM

  Why Draft WRs?

droopy309June 07, 2017 08:18AM

  It's not about the 2017 draft picks to me

snowman324June 07, 2017 08:44AM

  Re: Eric Decker anyone?

Rams43451June 07, 2017 08:56AM

  Re: Eric Decker anyone?

SoCalRAMatic320June 07, 2017 09:19AM

  Re: We don't even know what we have in our WR corp

RamsFanSinceLA290June 07, 2017 09:49AM

  really not injury prone

snowman322June 07, 2017 10:12AM

  Re: really not injury prone

RamsFanSinceLA344June 07, 2017 10:18AM