Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I doubt it

May 22, 2017 08:49AM
Quote
Rams43
Quote
zn
Quote

Yeah i think the Pats would find a way to use him

well the Rams did...2015. 9 TDS from scrimmage, 10 TDs overall.

The question now though is whether McVay wants THAT Tavon. The 2015 Tavon.

Or if he's in this frame of mind---either he's a receiver (ie a pure receiver) or we can't use him.




,

I doubt since in fact what happened in 2016 is that they DIDN'T use him the way they did in 2015. (Oh and I reject the idea that Tavon has a "limited skill set." He only does if you insist, against the evidence, upon judging him simply as a pure receiver.)

A simple look at the numbers tells you that. They run him less in 2016, and throw to him more.

Though of course every single offensive player except Britt (and possibly Donnal) backslid in 2016, which fits my view that multiple things went wrong in 2016 and (to make a remark on a separate topic from this one) that it's a mistake to act like just one cause lies behind at all.


.

...



Is it possible that the league has adjusted to Tavon's limited skill set?

I mean, the declining Tavon production might suggest that.

Has the league reduced Tavon to being a one trick pony?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  MMQB: Austin Not A Field Stretching, Downfield WR

RamBill1269May 19, 2017 09:34AM

  Austin Not A Field Stretching, Downfield WR

Anonymous User721May 19, 2017 09:50AM

  Re: Austin Not A Field Stretching, Downfield WR

Classicalwit391May 19, 2017 05:14PM

  Re: You assume Wrong Classicalwit

Anonymous User443May 20, 2017 12:17PM

  you know what they say about when you assume....

Rampage2K-473May 21, 2017 09:38AM

  He's right about OJ Howard

LMU93496May 19, 2017 11:47AM

  big penalties

wv ram441May 19, 2017 12:12PM

  I'd settle for even less...

JamesJM386May 19, 2017 12:19PM

  NFL penalty stats show......

NewMexicoRam333May 20, 2017 12:30PM

  Re: big penalties

reggae300May 20, 2017 12:44PM

  Re: MMQB: Austin Not A Field Stretching, Downfield WR

joram325May 20, 2017 02:08AM

  I don't think we know if he is or isn't.

RockRam357May 20, 2017 02:24AM

  Re: I don't think we know if he is or isn't.

Classicalwit346May 20, 2017 03:47AM

  Re: I don't think we know if he is or isn't.

zn376May 20, 2017 05:27AM

  Its all speculation as usual

Hazlet Hacksaw322May 20, 2017 03:08PM

  certainly I have my own ideas

reggae348May 20, 2017 03:25PM

  Re: certainly I have my own ideas

AlbaNY_Ram340May 21, 2017 01:14AM

  problem is (maybe)

zn278May 21, 2017 05:01AM

  Re: certainly I have my own ideas

Rams43335May 21, 2017 08:06AM

  to an extent sure

zn313May 20, 2017 03:51PM

  Absolutely

Hazlet Hacksaw259May 22, 2017 03:21AM

  Yeah, all speculations..

JamesJM313May 20, 2017 04:02PM

  True or false

reggae271May 20, 2017 05:54PM

  Re: True or false

zn286May 20, 2017 06:33PM

  Yeah i think the Pats would find a way to use him

Hazlet Hacksaw277May 22, 2017 03:24AM

  Re: Yeah i think the Pats would find a way to use him

Rams43284May 22, 2017 06:44AM

  well the Rams did

zn292May 22, 2017 07:44AM

  Has McVay come out and said any of this?

Hazlet Hacksaw404May 22, 2017 08:15AM

  No...I am reading between the lines

zn308May 22, 2017 08:31AM

  Re: well the Rams did

Rams43278May 22, 2017 08:41AM

  I doubt it

zn284May 22, 2017 08:49AM

  Re: I doubt it

Rams43293May 22, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: I doubt it

zn321May 22, 2017 09:15AM

  Re: I doubt it

Rams43314May 22, 2017 09:50AM

  Re: I doubt it

zn457May 22, 2017 10:01AM

  Not the only who thinks he knows

Hazlet Hacksaw276May 23, 2017 04:03AM

  Who cares and frankly he could be and has been here and there

LesBaker317May 21, 2017 11:24AM

  Re: Who cares and frankly he could be and has been here and there

dzrams280May 22, 2017 10:12AM

  Re: He is not a fit for this offense

merlin199May 22, 2017 06:57AM

  Re: He is not a fit for this offense

Rams43320May 22, 2017 08:43AM

  Totally disagree about a "drop mike" post!

Ramgator293May 22, 2017 08:46AM