Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: No proof of that

April 28, 2017 07:47AM
Quote
Flipper336
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
Flipper336
Quote
Rampage2K-
Still dumbfounded by that move???

One of the dumbest trades in draft history!!!!

No way we're the Niners taking the QB and no one was going to move up for a QB to block the Bears....

They got fleeced by a rookie GM to move up one spot for someone who was 99.99% going to be there at 3 anyway....

They're getting killed on sports talk radio and twitter right now and rightfully so.

If a staff drafts a Top 5-10 QB it's simply a matter of getting the right QB for your team. If he is the right QB, no one cares what you gave up, if he's not they don't care that you stayed put at #3 for him. The Bears wanted Trubisky, now all that matters is if he's the right QB for them.

They were completely bluffed.....the thing is though is that they could have had him easily without giving up a ham sandwich, let alone two 3rds and a 4th.

NO ONE was moving up for this kid, no one.... Silver was just on and said the Browns were never in the trade up to two game.

Lynch- "hey John, we're thinking about taking Trubisky......do you want him?"

Fox- "what do you want?"

Lynch- silently high fiving everyone in the room "how bout two thirds and a 4th?"

Fox- "Deal!!"

The draft is the ultimate game of poker and the Bears just got bluffed by the new kid at the table.

Cleveland easily could've made the move. Trubisky fits the Andy Reed mold better then Mahomes so the Chiefs are another possibility.

And at the end of the day they did what the Rams and Eagles did last year...to much praise. They targeted a QB they liked and made it happen

Thing is, the Eagles and Rams had to move up to get their guy, the Bears did not....the Eagles and Rams had 1% chance of getting their QB at the spot they were at, the Bears had 99.9% chance. No way we're the Chiefs going to move up from 27 to 2 for a QB with 13 starts under his belt. Silver was in Cleveland with the Browns and just said the Browns were not moving up for a QB.

I get it, the Bears wanted to be 100% sure they were getting their guy, but they panicked.....and took the Niners bait, no doubt.



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Seriously, wtf were the Bears thinking????

Rampage2K-1003April 27, 2017 11:07PM

  Re: Seriously, wtf were the Bears thinking????

bigjimram21449April 27, 2017 11:13PM

  Re: Seriously, wtf were the Bears thinking????

RFIP496April 28, 2017 12:29AM

  And here's the real kicker...MEANINGLESS WINS

RFIP306April 28, 2017 12:44AM

  When Pride Still Mattered.....

SunTzu_vs_Camus237April 28, 2017 04:23AM

  Understood but

RFIP214April 28, 2017 04:59AM

  I hear ya, RFIP...just sayin...

SunTzu_vs_Camus225April 28, 2017 05:26AM

  each to their own

JamesJM219April 28, 2017 08:39AM

  what I said, jm?? I'm not advocating being "satisfied" losing....

SunTzu_vs_Camus216April 28, 2017 09:48AM

  Re: what I said, jm?? I'm not advocating being "satisfied" losing....

JamesJM208April 28, 2017 01:02PM

  Honestly the trade is irrelevant for the Bears

Flipper336269April 28, 2017 02:25AM

  Re: Honestly the trade is irrelevant for the Bears

Rampage2K-203April 28, 2017 07:25AM

  No proof of that

Flipper336251April 28, 2017 07:38AM

  Re: No proof of that

Rampage2K-204April 28, 2017 07:47AM

  Again, you are assuming

Flipper336267April 28, 2017 08:28AM

  I doubt it's that clear cut

RamUK271April 28, 2017 03:19AM

  Re: That there was one QB in this draft who was remotely ready to play

merlin309April 28, 2017 08:32AM

  Re: That there was one QB in this draft who was remotely ready to play

RamsFanSinceLA204April 28, 2017 08:34AM

  Re: I think the Goff trade was similar.

Billy_T225April 28, 2017 08:39AM

  Re: I think the Goff trade was similar.

Rams43206April 28, 2017 09:44AM

  Well, I think this underscores that last year was the right thing to do. imo

SunTzu_vs_Camus293April 28, 2017 09:54AM