Quote
laram
Quote
dzrams
Come on! Bringing up Fisher. I know what you're trying to do but do better. lol
That's exactly what you did padna, saying that 2013, one year suggests he's not a hack.
Never mind Sanchez, Tebow and Gabbert being his top qb's in successive years.
If one year proves something what does 3 years prove?
I know you have very capable investigative skills, provide some info that runs contrary to my assertion!
Saying that "evidence suggests" a particular position is still not a conclusion. It's just a brick of evidence supporting a position.
A great year suggests he's not a hack; a terrible years suggests that maybe he is.
In order to say he's a hack conclusively, you're gonna need a lot more bricks than one.
So you have one alleged bad top 10 and three bad QB assessments. That's like 1% of his body of work.
It's your theory, you should prove your thesis. It's not my job to disprove it.
But since I do have considerable investigative skills, I decided to do a bit of research.
First I looked at 2011, and then I stopped. I got something quite different than what you got. Maybe we're looking at two different things...
Here was THR's 2011 Value Board:
1 - Patrick Peterson
2 - Von Miller
3 - Marcell Dareus
4 - AJ Green
5 - Robert Quinn
6 - Julio Jones
7 - Prince Amukamara
8 - Blaine Gabbert
9 - Nick Fairley
10 - Cam Newton
11 - JJ Watt
Looks like pretty good, "non hack" work to me.
