I look at one of Fishers decisions as an example of his want to make a better line but fail....IMO choosing Barnes to be his starting center. Not just for one year as a starter by way of injuries but to continue with him the following year. McVay cuts him...he is still out of work...and if he gets a job I don't think it would be as a starter. The demand of playing GRob and at the same time seeing his problems at the position.....McVay comes in and moves him out of the position immediately.....

My point being that although the RAMS have not shown improvement on the field yet with the new additions (yet) they have at LEAST seen and understood some of the problem areas and a LEAST have addressed them IMO very quickly......If Fish were still here how many think that Barnes would still be starting and GRob would still be in the running for LT? I would for 1.

Sometimes injuries are indeed a major problem with line development but IMO the choice of [players has as much if not more to do with it. If you address problems by using inferior parts you may be addressing the problem but not the needs and basis for the problems to be solved....IMO that is how Fisher addressed the situation.....