Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: yeah it is look again

April 13, 2017 04:00AM
Quote
TonyHunter87
So what. Not seeing the point. U are big on sites being fan blogs. Some fans know more than "insiders".

Well to me "insiders" don't matter, it;s analysts. Either way, you can like fan blogs if you want (I personally would rather read well-informed posters, same thing with less hype). BUT the key point is this. What I said was that it's a kind of myth that opposing defenses said all year that the Rams offense was easy to read. The fan blog in question doesn't address that.

Another point I made is that we fans overdo the "predictability" thing. I consider execution far more important as an issue. For example, I doubt anyone would describe the Seattle offense as "creatively unpredictable." One of the complaints about them throwing at the end of the superbowl, and getting the INT, is that they could have run Lynch on the Patz even if the Patz expected it. Another complaint is that Butler made that play because BB had them practicing against it because he knew it was something Seattle could do in the redzone. Yet there's predictable old Seattle in its 2nd superbowl. They had some players and they could execute.

I don't personally care if some fans think the future Rams offense is "creative." If it's a choice I would rather they just be seen as effective. Heck for that matter with McVay's 2016 Washington offense. They threw the majority of the time out of 3 WR sets and they ran the majority of the time out of multiple TE sets. That means the defense would know those percentages and tendencies. But they had some players and they executed. Didn't matter if some critics thought they were "predictable." They were effective.

The point is (agree or not) .... I'm saying that's not really the issue.

All that got mistaken in this thread as a defense of Boras. I was already saying during the season that the Rams offense did decently well in the 1st quarter in terms of scoring and then completely tanked in the 2nd through 4th quarters. To me that seems to indicate that the playcaller was not very good at adjusting to what defenses did to adjust to him. He was fine drawing it up during the week, but when defenses adjusted he was not good on his feet in game situations.

...



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/13/2017 04:50AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Josh Norris Asks Good Question Regarding Rams O-Line Draft Picks ('14-'16)

RamBill1149April 11, 2017 03:36PM

  Re: Two

merlin474April 11, 2017 03:50PM

  Three

LMU93424April 12, 2017 02:57AM

  Re: Three

Rampage317April 12, 2017 08:21PM

  Re: Two...Winner winner Chicken Dinner

Rampage405April 12, 2017 06:53PM

  Comfortable?

Atlantic Ram314April 11, 2017 04:47PM

  Re: Josh Norris Asks Good Question Regarding Rams O-Line Draft Picks ('14-'16)

CraigMatson344April 11, 2017 11:28PM

  Re: Josh Norris Asks Good Question Regarding Rams O-Line Draft Picks ('14-'16)

Rampage206April 12, 2017 06:55PM

  Zero...

jemach301April 11, 2017 11:43PM

  Here we go again

PHDram333April 12, 2017 04:47AM

  Re: Here we go again

CraigMatson292April 12, 2017 05:05AM

  the huge surprise about Havenstein

zn348April 12, 2017 05:37AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

PHDram271April 12, 2017 05:53AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

zn334April 12, 2017 06:26AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

PHDram301April 12, 2017 07:25AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

zn317April 12, 2017 07:37AM

  week 13

PHDram289April 12, 2017 07:52AM

  their predictability...

LMU93209April 12, 2017 08:04AM

  yes it can and is

zn296April 12, 2017 08:55AM

  that's a fanblog

zn267April 12, 2017 08:33AM

  not a fan blog

PHDram229April 12, 2017 09:09AM

  yeah it is look again

zn277April 12, 2017 09:40AM

  Re: yeah it is look again

TonyHunter87267April 12, 2017 09:50AM

  Re: yeah it is look again

zn275April 13, 2017 04:00AM

  Re: yeah it is look again

RamsFanSinceLA411April 13, 2017 10:18AM

  interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

ferragamo79410April 12, 2017 07:58AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

PHDram288April 12, 2017 08:16AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

Rampage2K-270April 12, 2017 08:21AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

Rampage594April 12, 2017 07:03PM

  to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

zn276April 12, 2017 08:35AM

  Re: to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

dzrams291April 12, 2017 10:04AM

  Re: to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

Rams43240April 12, 2017 10:16AM

  Re: to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

dzrams273April 12, 2017 10:51AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

Rams43235April 12, 2017 09:32AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

zn350April 12, 2017 06:46PM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

Rampage311April 12, 2017 06:58PM